Georgia Fiero Club Forum
All Things Fiero => General Fiero Discussion => Topic started by: TopNotch on September 29, 2019, 08:18:19 pm
-
I am now the proud owner of the club's 3800 "Formula" ("Formula" in quotes, because it began life as a duke coupe). I can't register it yet, but we're working on that.
Here's what the engine bay looked like when we got the car...

Here's what it looks like now...

Besides the obvious changes of the cleanup and new spark plug wires, you may notice that some if the wire loom has been changed. Some of the original wire loom was so brittle that it would crumble if you tried to move it a little. I replaced it with a braided high temp wire loom.
In the last test drive I told you about in the other thread about this car, the speedometer did not work. In the previous test drive, it did work. I basically spent this weekend trying to find the problem. I jacked up one rear wheel so I could idle the car in gear for testing. I finally found a bundle of taped up electronic components behind the center console (where the ECM would be in a normal Fiero) that, when wiggled, would make the speedometer work sometimes. This bundle had so much tape and heat shrink on it that it was difficult to tell what components were there. So I did a little research. It turns out that the Fiero speedometer needs the following circuit to work on a 3800:

So I went to Fry's and got the needed components, built the circuit, and soldered it in place of the old one, which I had cut out. The speedometer works perfectly now.
And BTW, after all the messing with wires I did, the gas gauge works now too. There might be something loose that i need to fix later, but I'll let it ride for now.
So with the gas gauge working, I put one of my other Fiero's tag on the back, and drove it to a gas station to fill it up. The gauge reads quite a bit above full, so I figure it will read quite a bit above empty when it is actually empty. So I'll refill it when it dips below half full.
And after returning from the gas station, the engine was quiet, with no loud tapping. I think it likes Mobile 1 oil.
-
Congrats! Glad this is squared away.
-
Congrats, Pat! I'm happy that you finally got it!
-
So glad to hear this. You certainly put in the work!
-
Not sure is the decklid struts were replaced or not, but it looks as if the seal was removed.
-
I
replaced installed the front sway bar end link bushings. I can't say "replaced", because there was nothing to replace -- not even a trace of the original ones. Fortunately, the long bolts and other hardware was still there.
-
You did not just replace the links in their entirety? My original end link bolts were there, but looked less than new, so I replaced them...6 years ago.
-
The hardware is just fine. The underside of this car, in general, is not show-car worthy, and it would take too much work to make it so. It's mechanically sound, but sitting out in a field took it's toll.
-
Yes, it is very sad to see Fieros just sitting out in a field. We saw one recently, after a discussion about people who park a driving Fiero in a field for years. My wife suggested I buy it, to avoid it going to the scrap yard. It was too far gone, for me.
-
Actually, it wasn't in a field. It was in his driveway-gravel parking area at the front of the house. The drive came in to the side of the house at the garage but he had a parking area up above at the front. I don't remember seeing any grass on the property. The area is heavily wooded except for the driveway and parking area and the car was covered with leaves from the years of sitting there. I'm sure lots of the leaves had already been removed from it as they prepared for us to pick it up.
Sitting over dirt and gravel that couldn't drain or evaporate moisture would certainly have eaten at the underside.
-
I've had my Fiero long enough that some new parts I installed had to be replaced.
-
Did the paperwork come through, yet?
-
Did the paperwork come through, yet?
It's actually been a bit of a nightmare. If you ever want to leave something to an organization (such as a club) when you pass away, make sure your will is probated.
Leslie (Lee's daughter) and I are working on it.
-
Still? I hope this works out for you. I appreciate your patience and sticktoitiveness.
-
I went to the tag office and registered the car this morning. It's now officially mine.
Fierofool thought that the engine in the car was a Series 1 3800, but after a lot of checking, I find that it is a Series 2. This means 205 stock HP versus 170 stock HP.
-
I went to the tag office and registered the car this morning. It's now officially mine.
Fierofool thought that the engine in the car was a Series 1 3800, but after a lot of checking, I find that it is a Series 2. This means 205 stock HP versus 170 stock HP.
Good news! On both counts!
-
I went to the tag office and registered the car this morning. It's now officially mine.
Fierofool thought that the engine in the car was a Series 1 3800, but after a lot of checking, I find that it is a Series 2. This means 205 stock HP versus 170 stock HP.
Great news. I'm glad for you.
-
Today I drove the car to work. Basically, it did fine. The SES light came on a couple of times, but no change in performance. I'll have to use my scanner to see what that's about. The oil pressure is kind of low at idle once it has warmed up, but it may be because I put 5-30 in it, and the oil cap says 10-30.
The brakes have a very light touch compared to my other Fieros, as if it had a big booster or some other change, but everything looks stock. So I'm wondering if that engine makes more vacuum than a stock Fiero engine.
-
I seem to remember that the 3800 does run very low oil pressure at idle. It's by design. Something like 5-12 psi.
-
I'm curious what it shows, if you put a vacuum gauge on the 3800, then compare to the stock V6.
The L4 and V6 both use the same booster, but I do not have an L4 to test.
My belief is that vacuum at idle should be about 18-22".
-
Today I replaced the PCM (powertrain control module) with one I had bought a while back on Ebay, and took the car on a brief test drive. It ran better, and the transmission shifted better than with the old PCM. And there was no SES light. So I'm declaring the engine done for now, and it's time to think about body work and paint. There's a bad spot on one of the aftermarket side scoops, that looks like someone just slapped a little resin or body putty on to "fix" it, with no sanding or shaping, and the dew wipes are completely rotten. And there's a few places where paint layers are flaking off, but I think the paint shop can handle those. I'm not sure when I can take care of these things, but hopefully I'll have it looking good next spring.
-
In time for the Don Hulse cruise?
If you find a good paint shop, let me know.
-
I bought a quart can of Evercoat Vette Panel Adhesive/Filler years ago, and it looks like it's finally going to come in handy to repair the bad spot on the side scoop. So I popped off the top, and found that it had settled over the years -- liquid on the top and the resin on the bottom. I used one of those paint stirrers that you put on an electric drill to stir it up, and after much work, it seems to be reconstituted. But when I squeezed the little tube of cream hardener that came with it, the stuff inside crunched. Fortunately, you can buy the cream hardener separately, so I ordered one. I hope this stuff works after all these years (it's expensive). This Sunday it's supposed to be a nice day, so I'll try it then.
-
If yours is no good let me know and I can bring some all-resin and mat. If they are aftermarket scoops and just fiberglass I also have some really good shortstrand repair filler as well.
-
I bought a quart can of Evercoat Vette Panel Adhesive/Filler years ago, and it looks like it's finally going to come in handy to repair the bad spot on the side scoop. So I popped off the top, and found that it had settled over the years -- liquid on the top and the resin on the bottom. I used one of those paint stirrers that you put on an electric drill to stir it up, and after much work, it seems to be reconstituted. But when I squeezed the little tube of cream hardener that came with it, the stuff inside crunched. Fortunately, you can buy the cream hardener separately, so I ordered one. I hope this stuff works after all these years (it's expensive). This Sunday it's supposed to be a nice day, so I'll try it then.
Pat, can you post a pic (or email it to me) of the damage? If it's aftermarket fiberglass you don't need the Evercoat. If it's stock RRIM you need a special product made just for that.
~ Paul
aka "Tha Driver"
Custom Fiberglass Parts (http://angelonearth.net/customfiberglass/)
-
Here are some pictures. I have done some sanding on the area, because parts were sticking up above the normal surface. I need to fill in the low places, and then sand it all smooth.


-
All that alligatoring will need to be sanded away or it will probably come back through any paint job.
-
Is that paint or gel coat cracking?
-
Just paint that Fiero cammo. No more worries about alligator paint.
-
OK; All that cracking has to be sanded off (if it's in the paint), or ground off (if it's cracked gelcoat). After that lets see what you have & we'll go from there.
~ Paul
aka "Tha Driver"
Custom Fiberglass Parts (http://angelonearth.net/customfiberglass/)
-
Paul, what is your opinion of MagicEzy gel coat hairline crack repair?
-
Haven't heard of it, but I've never seen anything that filled in cracks that didn't come back later after painting. I would grind all of that gelcoat off & smooth the entire surface with bondo.
~ Paul
aka "Tha Driver"
Custom Fiberglass Parts (http://angelonearth.net/customfiberglass/)
-
Today, after the Christmas party, I mixed up some of my (reconstituted) Evercoat Vette stuff with some of the new hardener I bought, and it got hard after a little while, like it is supposed to. Actually, the stuff smells just like Bondo, so I wonder just what the difference is.
If it's nice enough tomorrow, and I have the time, I'll use some to fill in the bad spot on the panel on my car..
-
Were you just testing what happened, or did some get applied today?
-
Today it was nice enough to fill in the bad spot. The straight-on picture doesn't reveal that the bad area is as much as 1/4 inch below the normal surface. Perhaps if I had taken an angle shot like this one of the patch, it would have shown the depth.

It kind of looks like the patch bulges in this picture, but it doesn't.
-
Just wondering, but do you have to strip everything with the cracks down, before you can really get to building it up and fixing things?
-
That stuff looks like the old Kitty/Tiger Hair filler that was a total pain to sand, very hard stuff. It is not really designed as a top filler but as a base filler to be applied directly to fiberglass or metal (it is waterproof as opposed to Bondo which sucks it up like a sponge). Totally agree, you need to strip/sand that thing down or you will be upset in a year or two when you can see the cracks through the paint.
-
Today I replaced the driver side dew wipe. That was the worst one -- hardly any of the rubber (now hardened) left. I was only able to get two of the screws out by unscrewing them -- the two closest to the rear view mirror (that you can get to with the window down). I had to drill out the one closest to the latch. The other two, that you would normally remove with Rodney Dickman's tool, were just lumps of rust. I pried on one with a screw driver, and broke the dew wipe off of it. The other I had to saw on a bit with a hack saw blade, and then was able to break it. I put all-weather double stick tape on the back of the new dew wipe (the kind used to hold sail panels) between the holes for those two screws, and used new screws at the other positions. It looks just fine now.
The other side is still mostly intact, though hardened and cracked. I'll do that one later.
-
Since you're painting this one, I'm guessig that it's all sorted. Is it good to drive on RFTH?
I'd like to know if you get a good paint job at this place. Mine needs the top painted.
-
I still get an occasional input air temp sensor error on the car, that doesn't affect performance. I'll probably replace that sensor.
I will work on suspension and brakes before I take it on RFTH.
-
The paint shop says I can get the car Monday afternoon. I guess it wouldn't have been ready for the Easter parade, but I'm anxious to get it back anyway. And with nothing coming up, I'll have plenty of time to put on emblems and decals, etc. Even though it didn't start out as a Formula, I'm going to put Formula decals on the doors anyway.
After all that's done, I'll take pictures.
-
Had it not been for the virus, it may have been ready for the parade. I have a couple of trim pieces out here that came with the car. Interior beechwood.
-
Back in the '80's, we paid $4,xxx for a paint job on a California Special Mustang. They notified us the paint job was complete, so we went to get it. The buffing was terrible, so we made them fix it. Weeks later, they said it was done. It was better, sure, but still needed work. They determined it was a prep issue, so stripped it down sgain, and re-painted. Most of the car looked good, except the hood, which had an orange-peel texture. When they called us, they offered to re-do the hood, or refund that money. This Mustang was due in a parade. We told them to fix the hood. We picked up the Mustang, drove it in the parade (sans hood), then took the Mustang back to get the hood. We neglected to state why there was no hood for that parade, which ended with a show. The Mustang won best of show--without its hood.
Pgackerman would probably have a big $ figure for $4K in 2020 dollars. My point is, paint jobs seem to take longer than expected, if you want them done right.
-
I'm excited to see how it came out.
-
I got the car back today, and put some decals and emblems on it, and some new wheels.
To refresh your memory, I got the car looking like this:

And now it looks like this:

More pictures:


Now to do the interior.
-
Looking good.
-
You didn't have the black molding painted?
-
Very nice. Any bubbling, overspray, clearcoat, or orange-peel issues?
-
I hate to point out the obvious, but the tail lights are now not as nice as the paint job.
-
Looking good. What did you end up doing with the old ground effects?
-
You didn't have the black molding painted?
I have to say I think they look better with the molding black, it breaks up the monotone.
-
I had figured Fierofool meant painted black.
-
You didn't have the black molding painted?
I prefer to work on that myself. The bumper molding will definitely need to be painted (satin black, most likely). The phony baloney ground effects had been attached with screws and double-stick tape. There is still tape residue that needs to be removed.
Very nice. Any bubbling, overspray, clearcoat, or orange-peel issues?
Only a little here and there. I am pleased with the job overall.
I hate to point out the obvious, but the tail lights are now not as nice as the paint job.
Yes, I know. Still a lot of work to do.
Looking good. What did you end up doing with the old ground effects?
I still have them. They're yours if you want them.
-
I need some Pontiac arrows. Is there another source besides The Fiero Store? Theirs seem to fade fast.

-
I had figured Fierofool meant painted black.
That's correct.
Pat, some of the PFF'ers have obtained some of the metal ones from other Pontiacs. They're a little larger but are factory and hold up well. They shaved off the ridge around the old arrowhead then placed the slightly larger emblems over that area. Pictures I remember seeing had a chrome trim. The G6 and G8 emblems on ebay motors is just 3.5 inches high. The Aztek and Vibe rear gate emblem is just 2.75 inches high and may be more flat than the front nose emblems.
At a distance, the black trim around the filler cap makes it look like it's too small.
-
Yesterday's pictures of my "new" Fiero were made in the evening after sundown. Here's one made this morning in bright sunshine.

-
Nice. You can get the arrow emblems from TFS. The emblems are nicer than they used to be. You should be able to coat them with UV-resistant whatever that stuff is.
-
Ya, I would appreciate them. Will mod and pull a mold from them.
-
Today I had to go to work and get some equipment for home, so I took the 3800 car. On the way home, I got it up to 80 MPH on I-85. I could never do that with the old tires, not only because they were old, but because at least one of them was either way out of balance or out of round, and the car would vibrate a lot at 50 and above.
It runs as smooth as glass on the new tires, but the handling feels just a bit loose, so I'll have to check everything. But I can tell that it's going to be a very nice highway car with that transmission that's in it.
Got to think of a name for the "new" car. How about White Lightning?
-
Out of curiosity, what is your highway RPM at 75 MPH?
-
Out of curiosity, what is your highway RPM at 75 MPH?
I have to fix the tach first. It read about twice the actual RPM. Or I could take my scanner on drive and see what it says.
-
Wrong VSS?
-
Wrong VSS?
Or possibly a bad tach. The tach in my yellow car read 2x when I first got it. I put in another one and it's perfect. I have another one to try in this car.
Edit: The scanner reads the correct RPM, so the VSS must be OK. I can pretty much tell by the sound what the real RPM is, especially at idle speed.
-
IIRC, this was originally an L4. Was the tach changed with the swap?
-
IIRC, this was originally an L4. Was the tach changed with the swap?
Yes all gauges replaced with Formula-style gauges.
-
Out of curiosity, what is your highway RPM at 75 MPH?
If the tach reads exacly 2x, then the RPM at 75 MPH is 2300.
-
Today I replaced the tach with the other one that I had. Bingo! It reads correctly now.
But a new problem has cropped up. Every time I start the car, the SES light comes on a few seconds later. So I hooked up my scanner to see what the problem could be. It said "EGR pentle is not positioned correctly". I'll get another one soon. The one that's on there looks very old and rusty.
-
Isn't it amazing, how new issues crop up? Clearly, this is unrelated.
-
I put a new EGR in today -- no SES light. And it adds a little bling to the engine compartment. It was expensive -- $150 (Autozone Duralast brand). Rock Auto has them MUCH cheaper, but I didn't want to wait.
Old EGR:

New EGR, on the engine:

It's prettier than the old one would be even if not rusted.
-
Yes, better design. What goes in that hole in the shield?
-
Yes, better design. What goes in that hole in the shield?
No idea. It might have been something required for the Buick the engine came out of, but not for a Fiero.
-
That adapter/mount block under the EGR valve could use an Evaporust bath, just so it matches the valve.
-
Today I had some time to work on the interior of "White Lightning" and it's almost done. Here are some pictures.
I liked the burl wood that Lee had put on the various bezels in the car, but some of it was in bad shape, so I bought new burl appliques.

The "Fiero" floor mat you see is from Rock Auto. I couldn't get toe old burl wood off the dash bezel, so I started with another one I found in the barn. Also, the shift bezel was in bad shape, so I bought another one from Ebay
Here is a picture of the interior before any work:

It was pretty yucky, with plenty of mold and other crud on surfaces.
I managed to get one of my new seat covers on. I may be able to do the other tomorrow.

Notice how nice the center console and glove box door look. Before, they were warped, as in this picture:

Actually, the hardest part to fix was the shift surround, which doesn't look too bad in the above picture. The soft plastic was separated from the harad plastic, as usual, and repairs had been attempted with several kinds of glue, and even duct tape. I had to clean all that junk off and repair it properly with the proper glue:

All that was needed to restore the door panels, besides new burl wood, was cleaning (and cleaning and CLEANING!), because...

The door panels used to look like this:

Little touches include a new horn button, because the old one was cut from an emblem that was too big, and didn't look too good.

The Fiero Store had an emblem that was just the right size for the new horn button:

I got some for the new wheels, too, to use instead of the wheel logos.

And besides all this, I've been driving the car around with some of that Thermocure in it (and plain water). The directions say to drive it at least 3 hours and up to several days with the stuff in.
-
Very nice!
Interested in how the Thermocure works out.
I had a black hand items in my brown interior Fiero, also.
That new sest cover looks awesome!
-
Impressive work Pat!
How do you like having the Automatic transmission? My '88 project car has the same trans and I'm just not up for all the work to put in a manual trans.
-
Nothing beats a good automatic transmission for driving in traffic. My silver Formula is also automatic, but the 4-speed in the white car will make the 3800 get better gas mileage than the 2.8 in the silver car.
-
To be fair, the 3800's are known for good MPG. The 2.8? Not so much.
-
The color on the center console surround was wrong, as can be seen in this picture:

Since the car used to be a 4-cylinder coupe, it wouldn't have had the extra gauges, and would have had a different console surround. So it was obviously replaced with a non-88 surround.
I found some paint at the hardware store that was fairly close to the 88 color, and painted it.

Unfortunately, the Fiero Store doesn't seem to sell exact match paint anymore, or I would have got some.
-
The x88 beechwood looks much better than the earlier brown.
I had thought that the shift surround overlaps the lower portion of the HVAC surround.
-
I had thought that the shift surround overlaps the lower portion of the HVAC surround.
It actually does, but the overlapped part is stepped in.
-
Would this be a bit too gaudy as a replacement arrow?

It's a Pontiac Solstice side arrow.
-
Very sharp.
-
Did the decklid have to be modified to clear the alternator? The 3800sc Series 1 in my '88 required a pretty good slice and the decklid in now warped. This all was done way before my ownership.
-
I found some paint at the hardware store that was fairly close to the 88 color, and painted it.

It looks a lot better than what came with it. Not quite as "orange" as the regular beechwwod. (Not a bad thing.)
But I really like how the stereo and EQ look. Is that your install? Or did it come that way?
-
Did the decklid have to be modified to clear the alternator? The 3800sc Series 1 in my '88 required a pretty good slice and the decklid in now warped. This all was done way before my ownership.
There's a notch cut in the brace to clear the alternator. I'll take a picture tomorrow.
But I really like how the stereo and EQ look. Is that your install? Or did it come that way?
The equalizer doesn't do anything, and the radio doesn't sound all that good. I'll investigate that later. There's also a "performance sound" subwoofer housing in the car. The wires from it are not connected to anything.
-
...
The equalizer doesn't do anything, and the radio doesn't sound all that good. I'll investigate that later. There's also a "performance sound" subwoofer housing in the car. The wires from it are not connected to anything.
Understand. That's just a nicely done installation. Most single DIN radios don't look as "integrated" in a 1.5 DIN hole. Obviously the EQ helps.
OTOH, there's no telling WHAT was done behind it. :D
I'm sure you can improve on the sound.
-
Did the decklid have to be modified to clear the alternator? The 3800sc Series 1 in my '88 required a pretty good slice and the decklid in now warped. This all was done way before my ownership.
This view shows the notch cut in the decklid brace to clear the alternator.

-
If you're looking for a good subwoofer system, Richard Chen may still have the one he removed from his Formula. It was a good operational unit. He said he didn't use or need it for the type programs he listened to on his radio.
-
Loving all the details you are sharing. Your build is looking great. Thanks for sharing.
-
Did the decklid have to be modified to clear the alternator? The 3800sc Series 1 in my '88 required a pretty good slice and the decklid in now warped. This all was done way before my ownership.
This view shows the notch cut in the decklid brace to clear the alternator.

Was the decklid re-enforced in any way, to be sure there isn't future damage?
-
...
The equalizer doesn't do anything, and the radio doesn't sound all that good. I'll investigate that later. There's also a "performance sound" subwoofer housing in the car. The wires from it are not connected to anything.
Understand. That's just a nicely done installation. Most single DIN radios don't look as "integrated" in a 1.5 DIN hole. Obviously the EQ helps.
OTOH, there's no telling WHAT was done behind it. :D
I'm sure you can improve on the sound.
There is an adapter to convert a single-DIN radio to a 1.5-DIN slot. It is nice, if installed correctly. Mine is backlit, with "Fiero" lit in red. The adapter looks as good as the aftermarket bezels look on any other car.
-
There is an adapter to convert a single-DIN radio to a 1.5-DIN slot. It is nice, if installed correctly. Mine is backlit, with "Fiero" lit in red. The adapter looks as good as the aftermarket bezels look on any other car.
That's a "HuMount" (https://maptech-enterprises.myshopify.com/). I have one on my yellow car, and ordered one for this car.
-
Something didn't come through.
-
There is an adapter to convert a single-DIN radio to a 1.5-DIN slot. It is nice, if installed correctly. Mine is backlit, with "Fiero" lit in red. The adapter looks as good as the aftermarket bezels look on any other car.
That's a "HuMount". I have one on my yellow car, and ordered one for this car.
Where did you get it? I don't recall where I got mine.
-
Where did you get it? I don't recall where I got mine.
Go back to my message. I just edited it to add a link.
-
Was the decklid rezenforced in any way, to be sure there isn't future damage?
Not sure. The place with the cutout was filled in. But there is a crack in the brace, so I cut a piece of SMC from the deck of my parts car and glued it over the crack with Vette Panel Adhesive. And I'm careful in opening and closing it.
-
With the shock hinges, there should be less strain on the decklid than with stock springs.
-
I talked with Richard tonight and he says the subwoofer enclosure is for sale.
-
Found and sort-of fixed another little problem with the car. Yesterday I wanted to take a quick trip to the store, but the windshield was foggy, so I hit the wipers. Nothing. So I wiped the windshield off with a paper towel and went to the store. Today I decided to investigate the problem. I found that the wipers did work with the switch on high, but only there. A check of the wiring diagram shows that on high, 12 volts goes directly to the wiper motor, but in all other positions, it goes through the pulse board. So I took the board out of my parts car in put it in the white car. Now the wipers work on all positions, but they don't completely turn off. In "off", the wipers still wipe at long intervals, like at the slowest pulse setting. So for now, I unplugged the pulse board.
-
TFS sells the pulse board, or the motor with the board, but you may be able to clean the board. Possible shorted contacts. Or a bad switch on the wiper control.
-
I have 2 or 3 motors and 5 or 6 boards. Problems with variable speeds can sometimes be in the switch in the column, especially if the car has been converted from 2-speed wipers to variable speed and the column switch wasn't swapped out. My 86 has a similar problem.
-
Did the base coupes have 2-speed wipers?
-
The Lil Duke Coupe had 2 speed but it was a zero options car. Variable speed were available, though.
I found a CD4 rpo for pulse wiper system. I haven't found a 2-speed rpo yet.
-
variable speeds can sometimes I have 2 or 3 motors and 5 or 6 boards. Problems withbe in the switch in the column, especially if the car has been converted from 2-speed wipers to variable speed and the column switch wasn't swapped out. My 86 has a similar problem.
Electronically, it would be impossible for 2 speed column switch to work properly on a pulse board. The switch for the pulse board has a variable resistor in it to provide the variable voltage to the pulse board to control different pulse speeds.
-
Today I traded pulse boards between my yellow car and white car. Now the white car wipers work just fine. I haven't tried the yellow car yet. I may have to get one of those pulse board rebuild kits from Rodney Dickman.
I also drained the water and Thermocure, ran water through until it came out clear, and then put in good old fashioned green antifreeze. (Have you noticed that some of these new mix-with-anything antifreezes are pee colored? Who wants to put pee in their car?) I got the air out of the system and ran it till good and warm. I haven't seen any rust in the overflow now.
-
Who wants to put pee in their car?
Dunno. Fierofool's Fiero didn't like it, and pee'd all over Scott's floor.
-
Pat, I have a bunch of delay boards in a drawer in the garage. You can try them to see if they will fix the problem.
-
Out of curiosity, what is your highway RPM at 75 MPH?
The old tach was actually more than 2x high. I have verified the new one with my scanner. My highway RPM at 75 MPH is only 1900.
-
Sounds about right. 8x MPH was 3.5K.
-
Corrected typo in my last message.
-
I knew this car had the beefier Formula/GT front sway bar and a rear sway bar added to "Formula-ize" it, but I never looked closely at the rear sway bar until yesterday. It had no end links, but the ends were held up with zip ties to keep it from flopping down. So I got one of those generic end link sets with poly bushings you can find at parts stores and put them in. Now I'll have to take it out on the highway to see how it does.
-
He must have done that just as he was getting sick. With the effort he put into the car, he wouldn't have left it like that, otherwise.
-
I knew this car had the beefier Formula/GT front sway bar and a rear sway bar added to "Formula-ize" it, but I never looked closely at the rear sway bar until yesterday. It had no end links, but the ends were held up with zip ties to keep it from flopping down. So I got one of those generic end link sets with poly bushings you can find at parts stores and put them in. Now I'll have to take it out on the highway to see how it does.
The sway bar cannot possibly have helped. I'm surprised the zip ties held.
-
The sway bar cannot possibly have helped. I'm surprised the zip ties held.
The zip ties were loosely tied to the body, not the suspension. No stress on them at all.
-
At least the sway bar ends did not fall down.
-
Observations after driving the car for a while:
1. When you push the GO pedal, it goes. I mean it goes more than I'm used to a Fiero going. You can find yourself breaking the law if you're not careful.
2. When you push the STOP pedal, it stops. I don't know what Lee did to the brakes because they look stock. But they stop better than either of my other Fieros (all 88's).
3. I haven't taken it on any hard curves, but with the rear sway bar connected, it feels nice and flat on what curves I have done.
4. With the cooling system cleaned up, it doesn't overheat. The fan hardly ever come on, unless you run the AC, which BTW, is working now. There's a switch wired up to manually turn on the fan if needed, and an LED which lights up when it comes on, either from the switch or automatically.
-
I like the LED idea. I wonder if the LED is wired in series with the fan.
-
I like the LED idea. I wonder if the LED is wired in series with the fan.
The fan is turned on when a relay is energized. The PCM or the switch provides voltage to energize the relay, and that voltage also lights the LED.
-
Great job on that car, Pat. Just work your way into the twisties. I'm sure that one handles much differently than your other 88's.
-
I like the LED idea. I wonder if the LED is wired in series with the fan.
The fan is turned on when a relay is energized. The PCM or the switch provides voltage to energize the relay, and that voltage also lights the LED.
Where is the LED located?
-
Great job on that car, Pat. Just work your way into the twisties. I'm sure that one handles much differently than your other 88's.
Can probably get used to it on the RFTH scouting run.
-
Where is the LED located?
On the place where the trunk popper switch is, below it where there would normally be the rear window defroster switch, if equipped, are three pushbuttons, with a LED beside each button. The top one turns on the fan, and the LED beside is is the fan indicator. The next one down turns on the driving lights. I have no idea what the bottom one is supposed to do -- I'll have to trace out the wires later.
There's also a tiny slide switch in the area between the trunk popper switch and the push buttons. I don't know what that's supposed to do either. There's a lot of mystery wiring to trace out.
-
Very creative. Too bad about that screw for the slider switch.
-
I have no idea what the bottom one is supposed to do -- I'll have to trace out the wires later.
There's a lot of mystery wiring to trace out.
At least you won't be bored.
-
Today I drove the car to work to get something I needed for working at home. The low voltage light came on, so I measured voltage at the battery both with the car off and with it running. It was higher with the car off. My local parts stores didn't have any of the proper alternators, so I ordered from Autozone, using their free next day delivery.
If this keeps up, there will be a lot of new parts on this thing before too long.
-
New alternator is in, and it works. I wonder what will die next?
-
Now you jinxed it!
-
The 3800 engine in "White Lightning" was dropped in directly from the Buick Park Avenue without modification apparently. It still had the power steering pump, with the input and output looped. I have read online that this hurts fuel economy, so today I removed it. Quite a job -- very little space to squeeze it out, and it was filthy. I'm gong to re-route the belt as described in this Pennock's article (http://www.fiero.nl/forum/Archives/Archive-000001/HTML/20041015-2-050342.html). If that doesn't work the other option is to get a power steering pump delete pulley, which West Coast Fieros sells. I hope option 1 works out, because I'd like to use the power steering pump mounting points on the block, fashion some kind of dog bone bracket, and mount the engine to the conventional Fiero position instead of the way it is mounted (to the firewall area). The current mounting transfers a lot of noise into the cabin.
-
How about vibration?
-
Well, the alternate belt routing is not going to work, some tolerances are too close. So I'm going with a delete pulley and standard routing. Besides, I decided that the mounting points for the power steering pump are not a good place to put a support bracket. Instead, I came up with this:

Half a dog bone is better than none. The front dog bones are still attached, so this thing will not have to bear all of the engine's torque. I can't run the engine very much without a belt, but it does seem to quieten the cabin noise some. And that's the main goal.
This was cut from a Rodney Dickman duke dog bone that used to be on my yellow car. I had replaced it with one of Rodney's rubber dog bones a while back. Gear bounce seems to be better with the Rodney's rubber dog bone, which is softer than poly, but harder than stock rubber.
-
I'm not entirely sure that arrangement is good for the alternator, but, as you said, the other mount is still in place. My suspicion is that the dogbone needs support on the other side, as well.
-
There are actually two torque struts on the other side of the engine. They are fastened to a steel pipe (or rod, not sure which), which is welded to the decklid hinge supports on either side. Those are the original Park Avenue torque struts. That side of the engine would have been at the front of the car, and the torque struts would have been in front.
-
I meant on either side of the modified strut.
-
I agree with Michael that you may be in store for a damaged alternator.
On most GM FWD motors, there are still threaded bosses on the lower sides of the block. One might be able to fashion a dogbone mount down there that could be attached direct to the cradle crossmembers. Just a thought. I'm not sure of how close the cross members are, but I know on the early cradle, they have the torque shock mounted to the cradle and the block, right beside the oil filter.
-
Yall know anyone that can fabricate a new mount?
-
Have to figure out how the mount will attach, first.
-
Actually, Lee had something similar to what I did on the car when I got it. He had a turnbuckle attached to the alternator, with the other end attached to the back wall via a hole drilled in it. I guess he didn't like the noise either. And I would think that would be harder on the alternator than what I did.
-
I've got a belt routing for no power steering pump that works. I learned about it from one of the many 3800 (not Fiero) forums out there. Someone with a Buick Skylark wanted, for some reason, to remove his power steering pump. He came up with this routing:

The stock tensioner pulley, which is a type 38015, is replaced with a larger type 38007 pulley. The belt is a Gates 5060663 or equivalent (metric size 6PK1685). The tensioner pulley is actually a little closer to the alternator and a little bigger than my crude drawing indicates, and the belt deflects a bit more than the drawing indicates. This routing seems to work OK.
-
Glad you got it figured out. Great info.
-
DANGER HIGH VOLTAGE!
Those of you who looked at my engine compartment at the last club meeting may recall seeing the reflective stainless steel on the firewall, and what looked like a light below the bar that the forward torque struts are attached to. Well, today I removed that light. It's wires weren't connected to anything.
Here is what I removed:

This is a neon-type light, which means that high voltage would be required to light it. Notice that the plastic sheath around the light is melted. The writing on the leads indicates that their insulation is good for up to 16000 volts. Personally, I don't think I'd want high voltage that close to the gas tank.
-
Neon actually runs off 120. I used to build channel letter signs which are lighted by neon. I always wired them into 120. They have a ballast transformer that pumps the voltage up but it's DC voltage.
I have a bunch of papers that go with your car. Part of them are for an Audiovox alarm system and there are other notes on things he did.
-
Real neon lights run off several thousand volts. A "neon sign transformer" is used to step up 110 volts to light them. I have two neon sign transformers. When my brothers and i were kids, we played with them, making "Jacob's Ladders".
We also made van de graaff generators, Wimshurst machines, and Tesla coils -- a regular Frankenstein laboratory.
Note: Coat hanger wire works perfectly fine for Jacob's ladders. You don't have to spend the bucks on copper tubing.
-
DANGER HIGH VOLTAGE!
Those of you who looked at my engine compartment at the last club meeting may recall seeing the reflective stainless steel on the firewall, and what looked like a light below the bar that the forward torque struts are attached to. Well, today I removed that light. It's wires weren't connected to anything.
Here is what I removed:

This is a neon-type light, which means that high voltage would be required to light it. Notice that the plastic sheath around the light is melted. The writing on the leads indicates that their insulation is good for up to 16000 volts. Personally, I don't think I'd want high voltage that close to the gas tank.
What held it in place?
-
What held it in place?
Zip ties.
-
Hmmm. Zip ties seem to be a recurring theme, on that Fiero.
-
Now you jinxed it!
Could be, because another part bit the dust. I was driving around, testing the AC, when the get-up-and-go got up and went. I turned off the AC, and still no power. And it was worse the higher the RPM got. Felt like a clogged cat.
I originally wasn't sure whether the thing at the cat position was a cat or just a muffler, but since I had felt it get hotter than the rest of the exhaust system after a little running, that told me that it was a cat. So I cut it out. Inside was some very fine honeycomb structure, and the structure on the intake side was broken up. Fortunately, the structure on the output side was still intact, so no junk got blown into the muffler.
So I got an appropriately sized "test pipe" at the parts store and put it in. The get-up-and-go is restored, and the exhaust sounds better now.
-
Does it have a deeper rumble than with the cat?
-
Does it have a deeper rumble than with the cat?
It has a deeper rumble with the test pipe. But the cat may have been partially clogged all along. The honey comb structure in it is much finer than the structure in Rodney's "high flow" cat. So it probably never was "high flow". The car seems to run better than ever without it.
-
I have the stock system on the 86 and there's a world of difference in the volume and tone of it and the 87.
-
What do you know? It works! But who wants to carry a 10 pound transformer in their car, just to power an engine light?
It looks white in this picture, but it's actually purple.
(Powered by 12 KiloVolt neon sign transformer.)

-
I still have a box of standoff clips used for mounting neon tubes if you want to install an inverter to power the transformer. Thing is, those things are illegal to display while driving. You could tell a cop that you forgot to turn off the shop light when you replaced the spark plugs.
-
Most of them would probably fall for that.
-
What do you know? It works! But who wants to carry a 10 pound transformer in their car, just to power an engine light?
It looks white in this picture, but it's actually purple.
(Powered by 12 KiloVolt neon sign transformer.)

It looks purple, to me.
-
Today I put in a new radio, in a new radio mount, and a keyless entry system.

The mount is from Maptech Enterprises (https://maptech-enterprises.myshopify.com/), formerly known as "HuMount". I had them put the "Fiero" under the radio, to raise the radio up and make room under it for the keyless entry receiver. And since the radio rests on the keyless receiver, not all the weight is on the skeleton.
It says "RIVER" on the radio because I was listening to 97.1 "The River" (classic rock).
-
Nice. Mine has Fiero on top.
Here, 97.1 is something else entirely.
-
My no-power-steering belt routing, seen below, did not work. I now have a WCF delete pulley and more standard routing. The belt is different from stock, because the delete pulley is smaller than the power steering pump pulley.
The belt slipped off the tensioner pulley, and got chewed up by the cooling vanes on the alternator. Fortunately, this happened when I started the car to go somewhere, not while I was driving.

Stock routing:

-
So, a 3800 water pump runs counterclockwise. Everything else is clockwise. Driving it on the trial run?
-
So, a 3800 water pump runs counterclockwise. Everything else is clockwise. Driving it on the trial run?
The water pump runs counterclockwise. I'm planning to take the car on the trial run. i have a little running around tomorrow, and if nothing bad happens to the belt, I'll the car on the run.
-
If you've read the post about the trial run, you know my 'new" car has a leaking transmission. The output shaft seal on the passenger side leaks -- badly during hard curves. So I ordered new ones for each side. They came today, and I found out why the passenger side is more likely to leak than the driver side. The driver side seal is a dual seal, while the passenger side is a single seal. I have no idea why they are different.
For now, I put some AT205 Re-Seal in the transmission, since I don't know when I'll change the seal.
-
Still planning on taking it on RFTH?
-
Still planning on taking it on RFTH?
Yes. The brakes are thoroughly flushed out, so hopefully they will be OK. I removed all the bleeder screws and replaced them with Speed Bleeder screws for one man bleeding. I used a turkey baster remove all of the old fluid from the master and filled it with fresh fluid. Then I bled all wheels starting with the driver side rear, which is the farthest one from the master. I bled enough to flush the lines and the wheel cylinder on each wheel.
-
Today I installed a new transmission output shaft seal on the passenger (leaking) side. The job turned out to be easier than I thought it would be. I undid the two side supports, the trailing arm (this is an 88) and the rear sway bar from the knuckle, so that i could swing it out, with the axle, from the transmission. The hardest part was removing the old seal. Fortunately, I have a nice slide hammer that made that possible.

I also have a fixture for the slide hammer shaft for installing the new seal. You can't just hit the seal with a hammer -- you could damage it.

However, I didn't have a perfectly straight shot to the transmission with the shaft, so I had to use the installer off the shaft. But I got it installed perfectly
In undoing the suspension, I found that the infamous 1988 "long bolt" was not very tight. That could explain a slight bit of squirrelly handling I've noticed. So when I re-assembled things, I made sure it was tight. And while I had the rear of the car off the ground, I tightened the other side as well.
Now I'm ready to do some curves without slinging transmission fluid onto the exhaust.
-
The tri-link bushings are all good, right?
-
All bushings are in very good condition. I have no idea of the actual mileage on this car, since the original duke instruments were replaced, but it doesn't seem like a lot.
-
Lucky you. I thought mine were good, but not so much.
-
Here's an update on the car. I sprayed grease cleaner on the underside where the transmission was leaking, and hosed it off. Since then, I've done a pretty good bit of driving in it, including some hard left curves. There's no sign of leaking from the transmission at all.
And the bad cabin noise is gone also. Here's what the engine bay looks like now:

I had actually rigged up the support bar you see before the trial run, and drove the car that way. No problems with it. But I hadn't taken out the old support bar on the firewall yet -- just rotated it so that it's attachments weren't touching the engine.
Today, I took the bar out, and here it is:

This bar is solid iron, drilled and trapped at each end. The mounting screws went through holes that originally had deck torsion bars in them (which is why the deck is supported by struts now).
-
Glad to read that the transmission isn't leaking.
-
Today I replaced the Mass Airflow sensor on the car. You may (or may not) recall that in the earlier thread on this car, that I mentioned that I thought there may be something wrong with it, and I had taken it off the car and blown a dust bunny off of it.
Before the new one, there has always been a slight lag between gas pedal press and engine response, as if it was taking a little time to decide what to do. With the new one, response is much better, but the idle hunts just a little. Maybe the computer has to learn the new one for a bit.
-
After a few miles driven, the idle is much better. And the response is just fine. I've only driven one other car that had a similar throttle lag to what my car used to have. It was the BMW the movie production company loaned me while they had my red Fiero. Maybe the BMW needed a new MAF sensor too.
-
Awesome!
-
Can you see what has changed (besides the direction the car is facing)?


If you guessed that the front is lower, you're right. I didn't like that the rear fender was 3 fingers above the tire, while the front fender was 4 fingers above the tire. So I got some Rodney Dickman 1/2" lowering ball joints for the front. While I was doing that, I also replaced the steering rack boots. They were in pieces, so I cleaned and lubricated the rack and put new boots on (also from Rodney Dickman). I marked each tie rod and carefully counted the turns necessary to remove the ends, and after driving it, I think I got it back together right. But I should probably get an alignment anyway.
Rodney recommends tack welding his lowering ball joints, and I did it to mine with my el-cheapo Harbor Freight flux wire welder. I'm not going to show you pictures of the welds, because they're not pretty. But they'll hold. Years ago I welded a broken steel bed frame (day bed in a spare bedroom) with the same welder (also not pretty), and it has held up to several grand kid over-nights, and even one of my 200+ pound brothers sleeping on the bed.
BTW, while I had it apart, I descovered that the lower control arm bushings are poly. Not red poly but black, so not noticeable right away. Whoever put them in slathered a lot of grease on them, so they don't squeek.
-
I am not a fan of the lofted front, either.
-
I like it. Nice job.
An added benefit of lowering the front of a Fiero - particularly an 88 - is that it tends to tuck the wheel under the fender, or at least give that illusion.
-
No performance aspect?
-
No performance aspect?
From my perspective?
It can only help, if you're driving "at or near the limit". Lowers the center of gravity a bit.
With that said... In regular driving, it probably doesn't make much of a difference. Especially since he's using balljoints to lower the car. The spring rate is unchanged. (Of course, there IS that slightly better view of the road, directly in front of you. An inch drop ought to be worth a foot or two. :D )
If Pat noticed a difference, I hope he'll jump in.
-
Mine is lowered, but not by using the lowering ball joints. I can't really say I noticed a handling improvement, though, but wonder if travel is a concern.
-
I've often seen comments that the bump stops were shortened when lowering the front end.
Lowering the front or raising the rear, whether by tire size or other means will reduce understeer and increase oversteer to a degree, depending upon how much rake. The higher the rear in relation to the front, the quicker the rear will come around in extreme cornering.
I have always thought the 87 and 88 base coupe body appeared to have a nose-up attitude. Maybe because it felt it was superior in handling. :)
-
That's not good.
-
I've often seen comments that the bump stops were shortened when lowering the front end.
When the front is lowered with lowering ball joints, the travel to the bump stop actually increases, because the lower control arm is lowered with respect to the knuckle and upper control arm. My front shocks are so old (but still good) that the limit of compression is clearly marked by the clean and dirty parts of the shaft, and there's plenty of room for 1/2" more compression. But I think I'll replace them before too long anyway.
So far, I haven't driven the car faster than about 50 MPH, so I don't know if there's any change in handling.
-
My front shocks went bad in 2 years. :( A previous set went bad in 3 years. This third brand had better last.
-
That's not good.
Actually, on the Fiero it is good unless done to the extreme. The Fiero is recognized as having some serious understeer. I find it easier to control a loss of directional control in the rear than in the front.
-
I'm used to "hanging the rear out there". In general, the understeer hasn't been a problem, as long as I stayed in the throttle. I did lose the front end, coming around a turn in the wet, but I was going somewhat faster than 50 MPH.
-
I also once spun mine in the wet on a curve. That seems to be a very common thread on these swapping ends, wet conditions. In the snow it would not steer at all, turn the wheel and go straight. After that i put a 50lb bag of sand on the spare tire. No issues after that that did not involve ice. My old 911 had factory twin batteries mounted up front, one in each fender in front of the tire and behind the headlights. I think the fronts are a bit light. Anyone on here do the battery relocation mod?
-
... Anyone on here do the battery relocation mod?
Mine is in the front. And when I swap my coupe, its battery will be moved to the front as well.
But not so much for the handling, although I'm sure it makes a difference. It just makes stuff on the "front" of the engine so much more accessible. (The battery in my 4.9 car was this >-< close to the belt and pulleys.)
-
... Anyone on here do the battery relocation mod?
(The battery in my 4.9 car was this >-< close to the belt and pulleys.)
Think mine has a bit less clearance
-
Just measured the rear mount full size battery in my boat at 38lbs. I pulled it for a motorcycle one and now have less trouble getting up on plane with passengers. Moving one from the the rear to front would be effectively like adding 70lbs over front wheels, pretty close to the bag of sand I was using.
-
I have yet another thing to fix in the white car. The heater core is leaking, and it seems to be getting worse. There is a coolant smell in the air when I run the AC or just blow air, and it's getting stronger. I found some info on Youtube, and the job doesn't look too hard. I'll update this thread when it's done. I just happened to have a spare heater core that I bought years ago. I'll leak test it this way: I'll fill the kitchen sink with water, submerge the heater core, stop one tube, and blow in the other. Hopefully, I won't see bubbles.
Edit: The replacement heater core checks out -- no bubbles. It's a used one I bought off Ebay, so I had to check it.
-
...
I found some info on Youtube, and the job doesn't look too hard.
It's really not. It's one of the easiest things to do, on a Fiero.
The most difficult part is getting the hoses off the old heater core fittings, without trashing the hoses.
Put something in the floor to catch coolant. It's almost a certainty that some will be spilled.
-
If you have the hose tool, its like an ice pick with the end bent at 90*, hoses come off fairly easy. The hardest part of the job is getting to the screw that's up on top of the heater box. I have a flexible driveshaft that I've used. At reassembly, if I have trouble getting that screw back in, I just skip it. Taking out the right speaker can sometimes be of help. Pad the rocker panel very well to keep from bruising your ribs.
While you're in there, try to find the weep hole for the condensate. When you do, let us know where it is. I've never found it.
-
Well, here's the story of the hoses. Those suckers were push onto the core tubes all the way to what would be the firewall, if it was a front engine car. There was no way I was going to get them off, so I cut them. I will get some short lengths of hose and some hose-to-hose nipples and clamps when it's time to reassemble things.
-
If you have the hose tool, its like an ice pick with the end bent at 90*, hoses come off fairly easy. The hardest part of the job is getting to the screw that's up on top of the heater box. I have a flexible driveshaft that I've used. At reassembly, if I have trouble getting that screw back in, I just skip it. Taking out the right speaker can sometimes be of help. Pad the rocker panel very well to keep from bruising your ribs.
While you're in there, try to find the weep hole for the condensate. When you do, let us know where it is. I've never found it.
I took a pic of that hole, and described the location for one of the newsletters.
-
Yep. October 2018, page 16.
-
While you're in there, try to find the weep hole for the condensate. When you do, let us know where it is. I've never found it.
I'll leave the actual location of the drip hole to GTRS. But I can show you how the water gets to it.
Water collects in this channel in the HVAC housing.

With the heater core removed, and the heater door open, you can see the channel running below the AC evaporator.

Edit: And yes, the heater core was leaking. It's a good thing I laid several paper towels underneath when I opened the housing up.
-
Is that some kind of filter mesh in the picture? What is it made of?
-
Is that some kind of filter mesh in the picture? What is it made of?
Some kind aluminum screen. My guess is that it's to protect the evaporator.
-
Protect it from...?
More worried about the condenser.
-
that screen is too keeep the bigger pieces of debris from clogging the coils, works really good at catching tar from cigarettes. My 86 has one also
-
Was it factory?
-
looked factory to me, dont know for sure
-
Interesting for 2 Fieros to have the same thing. My '88 did not. Um, still does not.
-
The car's back together now. The heater's hot, the AC's cold, and nothing's leaking. At someone's suggestion, I didn't attempt to put the top screw back in.
-
Which top screw?
-
Which top screw?
There are 4 screws that hold on the HVAC housing cover that must be removed to change the heater core. The top screw is very difficult to get to. Getting it out wasn't too bad, but getting it back in would be a real pain, and it really isn't necessary.
-
GM could've saved money by eliminating that screw, and kept the lettered sill insert.
-
If you've read the post about the trial run, you know my 'new" car has a leaking transmission. The output shaft seal on the passenger side leaks -- badly during hard curves. So I ordered new ones for each side. They came today, and I found out why the passenger side is more likely to leak than the driver side. The driver side seal is a dual seal, while the passenger side is a single seal. I have no idea why they are different.
For now, I put some AT205 Re-Seal in the transmission, since I don't know when I'll change the seal.
Was that a forewarning?
-
If you've read the post about the trial run, you know my 'new" car has a leaking transmission. The output shaft seal on the passenger side leaks -- badly during hard curves. So I ordered new ones for each side. They came today, and I found out why the passenger side is more likely to leak than the driver side. The driver side seal is a dual seal, while the passenger side is a single seal. I have no idea why they are different.
For now, I put some AT205 Re-Seal in the transmission, since I don't know when I'll change the seal.
Was that a forewarning?
No doubt. Should of taken the yellow car.
I did change the seal, though.
-
Do you have the 4T60? My output seal also nedds to be replaced.
-
Do you have the 4T60? My output seal also nedds to be replaced.
It's actually a 4T65E, and it's still in the car, and the car is in North Carolina.
Someone at the run with the same setup (3800 NA with auto trans) took a look at mine and said it's a 4T65E.
-
I'll be interested in reading what happened to the transmission.
-
Back to this topic, rather than hijacking the RFTH pictures topic. My trans died on RFTH. And one exhaust hanger gave way.
Well, the exhaust hanger is fixed. The only thing that happened was that the screws that hold the hanger to the cradle were missing. I put replacements in, and made sure that they were tight.
As for the transmission, I checked the fluid this morning. It is black, like motor oil that has been in too long. The transmission is definitely toast. Someone looked at the oil dripping under my car on RFTH, and said that perhaps the engine was leaking as well as the transmission. I'm not so sure about that anymore. He may have just seen the black transmission oil.
The engine oil is brown, and probably needs to be changed, but it's not black.
-
Chocolate brown?
From the slipping description, I figured that the clutches in the transmission had gone bad. Since there are several clutches, sometimes shifting manually to other gears can limp you back home. Itxs been a while since the auto transmission was explained to me, so the details of that statement may be wrong, but the broad strokes should be good.
Does the fluid smell burnt? Since there is no combustion in the engine, I'm not sure how it would get black. I've seen brown transmission fluid.
If the engine was leaking oil, it may be low on the stick.
-
It almost seems as if the valve body failed
-
The engine oil is only a little browner than new, and not low.
The transmission oil doesn't smell burned, and seems to be black with micro particles, like something disintegrated. Only first and reverse seem to work now. It will not go into a higher gear. Before I pulled off at that little store, I was really revving my poor 3800 to maintain any speed at all.
-
Sounds like valve body.
-
Well, after verifying that my transmission is a 4T60E, I bought a used one. It's out of a 1995 Oldsmobile with a 3800 engine, and has 118,000 on the clock. $450 including shipping, with a 90 day warranty. Includes torque converter.
I figured $450 isn't too much to gamble.
-
Do you have the transmission, or is it on the way?
-
Do you have the transmission, or is it on the way?
On the way.
-
Well, after verifying that my transmission is a 4T60E, I bought a used one. It's out of a 1995 Oldsmobile with a 3800 engine, and has 118,000 on the clock. $450 including shipping, with a 90 day warranty. Includes torque converter.
I figured $450 isn't too much to gamble.
Save the old one then I can rebuild it as a spare eventually.
-
My "new" transmission arrived yesterday. It will remain under wraps until I'm ready to put it in.
-
Today I installed a new transmission output shaft seal on the passenger (leaking) side. The job turned out to be easier than I thought it would be. I undid the two side supports, the trailing arm (this is an 88) and the rear sway bar from the knuckle, so that i could swing it out, with the axle, from the transmission. The hardest part was removing the old seal. Fortunately, I have a nice slide hammer that made that possible.

I also have a fixture for the slide hammer shaft for installing the new seal. You can't just hit the seal with a hammer -- you could damage it.

However, I didn't have a perfectly straight shot to the transmission with the shaft, so I had to use the installer off the shaft. But I got it installed perfectly
In undoing the suspension, I found that the infamous 1988 "long bolt" was not very tight. That could explain a slight bit of squirrelly handling I've noticed. So when I re-assembled things, I made sure it was tight. And while I had the rear of the car off the ground, I tightened the other side as well.
Now I'm ready to do some curves without slinging transmission fluid onto the exhaust.
I'm guessing you didn't get pictures of this. Do you recall if the shaft had splines on the outside?
-
It had splines on the outside, but it was the passenger side. I believe your questionable one is the driver side.
-
No, passenger side, but that does not bode well.
-
I've been slowly taking apart my white car in preparation for replacing the transmission. And i found something else i need to fix.
This is the passenger side axle boot. I wonder if I can just replace the boot with one of those split boot repair kits?

-
Don't bother.
-
I had good luck with a stretch boot.
Loike dis:
https://youtu.be/oEKY0uFlBpc
-
Well, the grease is out. The joint is likely bad.
-
I agree that joint is shot, and I agree that the "repair kits " are garbage. If you get one from a parts store be aware that there is usually 2 different part numbers. 1 will be rebuilt that has chewing gum wrappers for a boot, the other will be closer in thickness to oem.
-
Check with CV Source in Buford/Flowery Branch. It may be a special built axel. They were making axels for Whodeanie and Lee Arnette.
-
Likely the same axle I used.
-
Likely the same axle I used.
Where did you get yours?
-
Carid.com
60-1115 for passenger side
60-1078 for driver side
-
Carid.com
60-1115 for passenger side
60-1078 for driver side
Ordered one.
-
Mine came with an axle nut, lube, and install instructions. Part of the instructions included turning the engine off and putting the transmission in Park. I wonder how many people replaced axles while driving down the road...?
-
You never know. Remember what happened when Gorilla Glue forgot to warn against using it on your hair.
-
Gorilla Glue makes a mess of everything. Throwing hair into it wouldn't change much.
-
Any progress with the transmission?
-
Any progress with the transmission?
It's been raining the last few days, and yesterday was too cold. But my axle came in -- looks like it will fit.
-
Let's hope so.
-
Progress report: I'm almost ready to lift the car off of the cradle. Hopefully, I have disconnect ed everything above and below the engnie, removed the front cradle nuts, loosened the axle nut for the axle I have to change, and lowered the cradle onto my home-made dolly. I still have to remove the brake hoses, loosen the struts, remove the rear bumper cover, and hook up my shop crane to the rear bumper. Then I'll remove the cradle bolts and lift the car.
A few days of rain are coming, and I will wait for clear days to continue.

-
What is hanging from your brake hose?
IIRC, your exhaust was a little sleepy. Will you be fixing that, while the cradle is out?
-
Are you working out on the driveway extension or did you get it into the garage?
-
What is hanging from your brake hose?
IIRC, your exhaust was a little sleepy. Will you be fixing that, while the cradle is out?
I was curious myself, so I went out with a flashlight and looked. It fell off when I touched it, so it was just miscellaneous debris.
I will check everything while the cradle is out.
-
Are you working out on the driveway extension or did you get it into the garage?
Outside, under my home-made car port. It keeps direct rain off, but sideways rain is still a problem.
-
Update on what I've been doing...
I removed the rear bumper cover and jacked up the car using the metal bumper. In my opinion, this is the safest way to do it. The plastic covers the trunk area to keep out any sideways rain and the huge amount of pollen that has been falling lately.

With the car lifted and on jack stands, I rolled out the cradle.

There are a lot of little things I am going to work on while the engine is out. In this picture you can see the plug that connects the engine wiring to the power train control module that is in the car. One thing that I didn't like is that wires that were too ling were just looped back, and the loops were gathered into bundles and combined with other wire bundles inside wire looms. I cut all of these looped wires, soldered the ends together, and protected the solder joints with heat shrink tubing. There were two of these loop bundles, but I had already fixed one when I took this picture.
I also replaced two of the firewall side spark plug cables. I had done them "blind" before, and made one too long and one too short. They're all a good length now.

-
Thanks for the update.
-
The firewall side of the engine, with good spark plug wires and engine wiring connector.

-
Gonna coat the exhaust, while everything is out?
-
Those plug wires really need some protection from that manifold. On Melanie's GP, there was a plastic channel that the wires ran through, just below the edge of the valve cover and each wire exited at its respective plug. Due to a fire recall (the valve cover leaked, the oil got on the manifold, and caused the plastic channel to catch fire) they removed the plastic channel rather than replacing the gasket with a better one. Once the plastic channel and its cover were removed, the wires just hung there, but they weren't as long as yours are.
-
Shorter wires could be used, or ther could be zip-tied to that bracket up by the coils.
-
The wires are not as close to the manifolds as they appear in the picture. And the one wire that I didn't change showed no heat damage at all.
-
I'd go with much shorter wires to eliminate the loop below the exhaust manifold. They flop around at speed.
-
Ain’t broke don’t fit it. Who am I kidding. 😂 of course we will re-engineer everything. 😂
-
Side view showing that the spark plug wires are not too close to the manifold.

-
Sorry. Didn't intend yo jump on you.
-
Today I re-did all the bad wire looms, and also fixed the driver side power window on my yellow car. A poor solder joint had broken inside the rubber bellows that passes wires from the door to the car (my fault -- the power window wiring is home-brew).
-
I fond a strange sensor on the side of my oil pan, with no wire connected to it. The only thing I can figure is that it's an oil level sensor of some kind. (And yes, I now my oil pan is caked with crud.)
-
I have one on my 3.4 pan
-
I wonder if that could be wired to the oil light.
-
Oil temp sensor or oil heater for cold weather????
Harry
-
Yesterday I took the shrink wrap off my "new" transmission. I suppose I should have done that when I bought it, but I wanted it Protected from weather. Anyhow, it looks just like the old one, so it must be the right kind.
But I found a tag on it which says, "Replace front seal and index torque converter completely prior to installation." I have no idea what indexing a torque converter is, so I hope someone transmission savvy will explain it.
I took out the bad axle, and found that the new one is slightly longer. I hope it's OK, but there's always plan B. Clean out and re-pack the old one with the a split boot on it.

-
It looks as if the ends are longer.
-
The large engine and transmission fit so tightly in the cradle that I figured it would be easier to separate the transmission from the engine by lifting them off the cradle and setting them on a smooth board

This actually worked out very well, except for one problem. When I lifted the transmission with my cherry picker to set it on the creeper as you can see in the picture below, it tilted and smelly burnt trans oil spilled out, and I had a mess to clean up.

I still have to take a number of things off the old transmission and transfer them to the "new" one. For example, the dipstick tube that you can see part of in the picture below, is meant for a front wheel drive car, and curves over the transmission. The dipstick tube on my old one is shorter, and accessible from the back.
I installed new axle seals and a filter in the "new" transmission. The "new" transmission is very clean inside, so I'm hoping it runs as good as it looks.

-
That covering on the exhaust looks nice.
-
That covering on the exhaust looks nice.
If you mean that heat protector on the manifold, I think all 3800's have it. My question is, for those familiar with the engines, is the heat protector only on one side of the engine (like mine), or should it be on the other side also?
-
Mel's 3800 GP only had it on 1 side, near the passenger compartment.
-
Interesting. Are the manifolds interchangeable?
-
Pat, if you think your replacement axle is too long and you still have the option of returning it, I would consult CV Source in Buford/Flowery Branch and have them replace the center shaft. That's what looks to be too long, to me.
-
I have found a number of things that weren't quite right while working on this project. One of the bolts that hold the transmission to the engine was missing. Both of the transmission mounts had only two of three bolts holding them to the transmission, and the bolts on one of them were loose.The crossover pipe connection to one of the manifolds was loose. I'll be getting a little extra hardware when I put this thing back together.
-
Interesting. Are the manifolds interchangeable?
From the looks, no. (Answering my own question.)
-
Did the drivetrain feel loose?
-
Did the drivetrain feel loose?
It felt just fine.
-
No extra movement of the engine?
-
The loose parts may have contributed to cabin noise. I'll find out when I get it back together.
-
If they were loose, all motor and transmission mounts are suspect. Are those part of the "extra hardware"?
-
She's back in the
saddle cradle again, with the "new" transmission.

Here's a tip for installing a transmission onto an engine. Get a couple of bolts of the right diameter, but too long, and use them as guides while moving the transmission into place. Then replace them with the proper bolts.

-
Looking good Pat
A variation of the long bolt trick is to cut the head off then cut a screwdriver slot in the shank. Those are handy to line up all sorts of things, especially if the parts have gasket between them.
-
Cool.
Will you treat the rust on the knuckles, replace the struts, and treat the rust on the strut hats, whole everything is out?
-
Will you treat the rust on the knuckles, replace the struts, and treat the rust on the strut hats, whole everything is out?
No, no, and no. The struts are fine, and there's hardly any rust on those parts.
-
Since my last report, I put the exhaust back together, using shiny new hardware where appropriate. And since part of the exhaust is a bit too close for comfort to some wires, a vacuum line, and a coolant hose, I added a little protection. I also put the throttle body back on, using a new Felpro gasket.

The new axle turned out to be too long. The difference is more than you see in the previous comparison picture. The tripot of the new one is almost completely compressed, while on the old one, it's not. I would have to shorten the shaft more than an inch to make it fit, so I put a split boot on the old one.

I may be able to put this thing back in the car tomorrow.
-
Hmmm. Surprised on the length, but I ordered 2 sets of the same parts, and the first set had the wrong splines.
-
My cradle, with the engine and transmission attached, is back in the car. Nothing is hooked up yet, but the trickiest part is done.
-
Glad you're making progress.
-
Question, based on a prior post. If you had installed an axle that was, say, half an inch too long, what would happen?
-
The tripot would bottom out, and the axle would be damaged.
-
Would the car shake, if under load?
-
Would the car shake, if under load?
It might.
-
:(
-
All the underside connections and removed items have been replaced. My QuickJack made that job a bit easier.

-
Will you be taking this Fiero on RFTH 26?
-
Will you be taking this Fiero on RFTH 26?
If it works ok.
-
Not rushing you, but all back together?
-
Not done yet. I keep running into little snags that slow things down. Today's snag requires an explanation. On a stock Fiero, when you drop the cradle, you have to disconnect the ECM and other things, and feed the wires through the little hole in the firewall. My car has a connector on the firewall that passes all those signals through, so you just disconnect that connector when you drop the cradle. The connector has a LOT of pins, and uses a screw on the connector into a threaded part on the firewall connector.
Well, I couldn't get that connector to go onto the firewall connector to save my life, and struggled with it all afternoon. first, the threaded part on the firewall connector came loose, and would spin with the screw on the other connector. I wound up super-gluing it. And the firewall connector was not mounted very well, and would move when I pressed the other connector onto it and tried to start the screw. I wound up using JBQuick to secure it.
It's back together now, so maybe I will finish tomorrow.
-
Well, at least youxll know of this quirk, if you ever have to drop that cradle again, and these snags should be solved.
-
It runs! But only briefly, because I haven't put coolant in it yet. I re-assembled the back bumper, and put the tail lights in. I seem to have misplaced my air cleaner can and mount, but they have got to be around here somewhere. They are custom modified for this car, so I can't just look for replacements in the barn.
-
Excellent! Driving, soon.
-
I found my air cleaner parts and put them on. The SES light comes on after a few seconds of running, but no codes are set. I'll find out tomorrow if putting coolant in fixes that
So far, I have put 2 gallons (8 quarts) of ATF in the transmission. I doubt that's enough for a completely empty transmission, but it does pull if I put it in gear.
I forgot to mention that I discovered that all of the rear suspension bushings have been replaced with poly. It's black poly, so not immediately obvious. They say poly makes for a harsher ride, but I never noticed anything harsh about it.
-
Mine is all polly. The ride is fine. Not as nice as the CTS-V, or the A8, or the Avalanche, but better than the Silverado.
-
Well, I found the problem causing the SES light. One of the connectors to the transmission was not connected. My scanner gave me a clue when it reported that my transmission fluid temperature was -37 degrees. Now that's fixed, and there's no SES light.
But the scanner indicated another problem. There is a switch mounted on the transmission selector lever called the PRNDL (Park Reverse Neutral Drive Low) switch. For an electronically controlled transmission, it tells the Powertrain Control Module (PCM) what gear the transmission is in. My scanner shows the proper gear if you are in drive or neutral (drive shows up as 4th on the scanner), but if you are in park or reverse, the display alternates between ???? and 4th. Autozone, Advance Auto, and Napa don't have the switch, but Rock Auto does, so I ordered one.
I'm still checking out the car, and haven't actually driven it yet.
-
Mine shows Park and Neutral, but not the other gears, IIRC.
-
Hmm... The forum turned my string of question marks into an emoji in my last message.
Well, tonight I finished modifying my torque strut, so I'll try driving it tomorrow, after giving it a bath. There's so much pollen on the windows that you can't see out of them (and on the rest of the car, too).
-
I took "White Lightening" for a test drive today. The "new" transmission shifts smoothly, but when I got home, there was much steam rising from the drive side engine vent, and a dribble path behind me. So I have a coolant issue to deal with now.
-
Crossover pipe to coolant tube?
-
Well, I'm a dummy. See the radiator cap in this picture? It was loose.

-
At least it was an easy fix.
-
Drive it around this weekend. Come out my way, then up toward Roger so you're staying close to someone who can come help you in the event of a problem. You want to make sure everything's proper before taking it out on the expressway next weekend to attend the meeting.
Congratulations.
-
That loom in the back of the picture looks really nice.
Good job.
-
Took it on another test drive, a bit longer this time. No steam or dribble this time. But now I have to charge my AC and see if it works before I do any longer test drives. It's getting hot out there.
And I have been working on the car so much, I've neglected my yard work. Got to git 'er done.
-
Remember when I mentioned that my transmission mounts were missing bolts? Well, in the case of one of them, the mounting boss on the transmission case was broken off. The "new" transmission still has that mounting boss, so I was able to attach the mount properly.
The reason I am mentioning this is that I was originally thinking of rebuilding the old transmission to have a backup, but that mounting boss would somehow need to be rebuilt.
So maybe I won't rebuild it. Someone mentioned needing the oil pan for one of these transmissions. I'm not in any hurry to do anything with it right now, though, because I'm tired of smelling old trans fluid.
-
Probably me, but I found a pan.
-
Well,my AC works, but i need to fine a good HVAC fan motor. Mine makes bad bearing noises at times. Come to think of it, the one in my yellow car is also noisy at times. I'll see what I can find in the barn.
The engine has trouble idling in park, but is OK in neutral or drive. I think it's because of that bad PRNDL switch (also called a Neutral Safety Switch). It's not giving the PCM proper info when the transmission is in park. I've got one coming from Rock Auto, but I think I'll try to clean the one I have. The switch has a cover on it held on with torx screws, so I can take it apart for cleaning.
I used the car to go to the store today, and it did just fine.
-
Fortunately, the HVAC motor is easy to replace. It sticks right out there. While mine was out, I cleaned up the squirrel cage, and cleaned out the ductwork. I also wiped the ductwork down with some of that juice that pests don't like.
-
i cleaned mine out when I changed the eater core a while back.
Unfortunately, cleaning the switch didn't help. But at least, I saw how it works. The "cover" is actually part of the switch, and has curved circuit tracks on it. The other part of the switch has contacts that move as the gear selector moves.
The new switch should be here in a few days, and then we'll see what happens.

-
There are several HVAC motors with squirrel cages in the parts barn. Your parts car probably still has one too?
-
I'll look for a HVAC motor when the storms are over.
There are different things that seem to control the idle speed on this system. One is the PRNDL switch. In neutral, the idle speed is constant. When you switch into drive, the idle speed briefly speeds up a little, because the PCM knows that there will be additional drag from the torque converter. If you let the car idle in park, the PCM doesn't got good info from the switch, and the idle speed gradually slows down, and after a few minutes, the engine may stall.
But the AC also seems to control idle speed. If the AC is on, and the car is in park, the idle speed doesn't slow down. The AC compressor is a V5 "always on" compressor, and the PCM knows that there will be additional drag on the system, and so keeps the idle speed up.
-
Mine does increase the idle when the SC is dngaged. Not when going from N to D, though.
-
Since I have a new PRNDL swtich on the way anyway, I tried monkeying with the old one again to see if I could make it work. In the first picture, you can see what's inside the switch. There's supposed to be a rubber gasket in the depression around the outside of the metal part, which was FUBAR, so it's good that I'm getting a new switch. After my monkeying, it still doesn't work. The 2nd picture shows the codes I was getting. QDM 4 is also related to transmission electronics, and the new switch may clear that as well. I don't know what caused the Fuel Trim Lean.


-
I hope that clears the QDM code.
-
Yesterday I got the new switch and put it in. There are still problems, but I will live with them for now, as they do not affect the drive-ability of the car. It seams that the switch positions do not exactly correspond with the transmission lever detente positions. in park, the transmission should indicate "neutral" to whatever circuit the scanner is reading. If you put the transmission in park, and then press slightly forward on the lever on the transmission with your fingers, it does indicate neutral on the scanner.
So I ordered a Helms manual for a 1995 Buick Park Avenue from Ebay. I will study the circuit, and perhaps add a momentary push button that is pressed by the lever on the transmission when in park, wired to give the proper indication.
Currently, the scanner indicates "4th" with the console shift lever set to Drive, "Neutral" in neutral, and if you pull the shift lever all the way backwards, it indicates "Low". I'm pretty sure that much is normal.
-
Just a minute difference in the fulcrum point of the lever or the location of the cable attachment to the lever can change the travel at the other end where the switch is located. Even length of the cable can affect it.
-
My Fiero's shift lever does not quite match the detents to the gears. Reverse is a bit off, as is Neutral. It's difficult to get into first. The other gears are good, though.
-
Oh. There is an adjustment on my switch.
-
Oh. There is an adjustment on my switch.
If you mean the elonged mounting holes on the switch, they don't fix my problem, and 4th and neutral work best with the mount centered anyway.
-
Mine has a marked hole on the switch to allow adjustment.
-
I guess my article isn't published, yet, so here is what I found with a quick search.
https://www.fiero.nl/forum/Archives/Archive-000001/HTML/20160323-2-122706.html
-
Did you get the QDM code resolved?
-
I thought I had read something previously that said QDM4 had something to do with the transmission, but it does not. QDM4 (Quad Driver Module 4) controls
1) the AC clutch relay (can't be that, because the AC works).
2) the low speed fan relay.
3) the high speed fan relay.
Since the car has no 2-speed fan, that could be the source of the problem. I will investigate when I get the manual.
All these outputs energize the appropriate relay by pulling to ground. The error is set if the voltage of any output is not what is expected (which should be near 12V if off, or near ground if on). So the fix may be as simple as adding a pull up resistor on whatever output is not used (for example, low speed fan).
BTW, the car has never overheated since I flushed the cooling system.
-
I was thinking you could just make either fan trigger activate the same fan.
-
I was thinking you could just make either fan trigger activate the same fan.
That may not work. If the low speed signal is pulled down, and the computer is still monitoring the high speed signal, expecting it to remain high, it may trigger the QDM4 error.
-
It shouldn't affect the high-speed signal. The low-speed should have its own relay, and connect to the fan on its own.
-
It shouldn't affect the high-speed signal. The low-speed should have its own relay, and connect to the fan on its own.
But for both signals to work the same relay, they would have to be connected together. So if the low speed signal activated (was pulled low), it would of necessity pull the high speed signal low also. The computer would see it go low when it hadn't commanded it to go low, and that could be an error condition. I supposed I could alleviate that with diodes and pull up resistors.
-
Yes, diodes and separate relays.
-
I took the car to the meeting today, which is a fairly long drive from my house. I came home to find some of the wire loom melted. I had bought it from Amazon. So I ordered some from Summit Racing, which is supposed to withstand high temperatures. We'll see.
-
You may recall that my loom succumbed to the heat in my engine bay, as well. I finally ended up with the high-temp loom, which has a silver stripe. The loom that was good to 450F melted.
-
...
I finally ended up with the high-temp loom, which has a silver stripe.
The last batch I bought also had the silver stripe, but it feels thinner than I would have expected.
I haven't tried to melt any of it yet, however.
Pat, you've done wonders with that car. It looks great!
As I mentioned, I also like the "dog bar". :D
-
Pat, you've done wonders with that car. It looks great!
As I mentioned, I also like the "dog bar". :D
Of course, I haven't seen it in person, but it went from nasty to nice, in the pics.
"Dog bar", as opposed to "dog bone"?
-
"Dog bar", as opposed to "dog bone"?

-
Ah, yes.
-
Here's my fix for the PRNDL switch. When the transmission is in park, the lever presses the little push button switch, which grounds the wire that indicates neutral. The car idles perfectly in park now.
-
What is the light nlue stuff?
-
What is the light nlue stuff?
Some kind of sealant, where the wire bundle enters the switch.
-
Ah.
Did you get the high-temp loom in?
-
Did you get the high-temp loom in?
Yes
-
Your shift lever looks a lot nicer than mine.
-
I found and fixed another little problem with the original build. After my test drives, I've seen a few drops of oil on my driveway under the car. I looked, and it sure looked like it was coming from the front crankshaft seal, so I pulled the balancer/crankshaft pulley. BTW, that's another job that's easier on a 3800 than on a stock Fiero. For one thing, the dust cover at the flywheel/flex plate is very easy to remove, and there's a little notch there that looks like it was just made to allow you to clamp the ring gear in place with vice grips so you can remove the pulley bolt.
But when I removed the pulley, there was no oil on its back side, and the seal looked fine. I put a new seal in anyway and searched for the source of the oil. Finally, I found a bolt hole on the timing cover with no bolt in it. The hole was hidden by some wiring and not readily visible. The oil appeared to be weeping from that hole, and trickling down to where the crankshaft pulley attaches. I put a bolt in the hole and went on another test drive. The dripping appears to be fixed.
-
I wonder how they missed that?
-
My AC gave out on the way back from the club meeting. I've already got a compressor and other parts ordered, so hopefully I can get it working before Carlisle, or it will be a hot ride there (and back).
-
If it isn't one thing...
Mine started squealing and smoking the belt when engaged, so it will go back to the shop when I get the engine running right.
-
My car is ready to receive new AC components. One of the things that makes installing the compressor easier on the 3800 is the fact that it uses studs, not bolts, for mounting. It's hard to line up a heavy compressor with bolt holes while lying under a car, but you just slide it on with studs.

-
That does look easier, as long as you have clearance to slide it off.
-
I've decided that my 3800 is a Franken-engine. I know that the PCM is 1995, because it's OBD 1.5. OBD 2 started in 1996. But the AC compressor arrived yesterday, and I had ordered a 1995 Buick Park Avenue 3800 AC compressor. It was the wrong one. Turns out that my engine takes the 1996 and newer compressor. So either they changed things mid-stream in 1995, or my engine is a 1996 (or newer) engine.
In any case, the 95 compressor is on it's way back, and the proper one is coming by 2-day express. It's supposed to be here Friday.
-
Paraphrasing Johnny Cash,
"It's a '94, '95. '96 automobile..."
-
At a car show a few years ago. I kept trying to figure out a particular Packard. Finally, the owner told me it was a Johnny Cash Special.
-
My car is ready to receive new AC components. One of the things that makes installing the compressor easier on the 3800 is the fact that it uses studs, not bolts, for mounting. It's hard to line up a heavy compressor with bolt holes while lying under a car, but you just slide it on with studs.

Could a stock Fiero engine be fitted with studs?
-
With the right tools and unlimited resources, anything is possible.
-
While my engine was out, some of the hard-to-replace bolts were replaced with studs. I meant easily replaceable.
-
If I knew how hard the bracket wasn’t to remove I could give a good answer. But once it’s removed it’s very easy.
-
I believe the 3800 has a serpentine belt. The Fiero's V-belt would likely make this difficult.
-
The Fiero has an adjustment to tension the belt. Sans that, a spring loaded tensioner would be needed. The Fiero compressor does have 3 ears on its face, so it would be possible to mount it on studs, but it would probably be difficult to get the compressor up into position in the Fiero due to possible clearance issues on the clutch end. Our compressors are used on other vehicles, so it's possible they mount on studs in some other vehicle.
-
My AC is back together, and it works, but I need to take it on a good test drive to make sure. Today's not a good day for that, since the outside temperature is only 73F (23C). It supposed to get up to 80 tomorrow after the morning rain is done, so I'll go then.
I managed to find and fix a potential problem while under the car, too. One of the transmission oil cooling lines was not clamped securely. Trans fluid was weeping out where it was clamped, so I tightened the hose clamps.
-
Sounds as if it'll be all ready for the trip, next week.
-
This car seems to be doing pretty good, since I solved the disappearing ATF problem. But there's one thing I'm going to have to check when I get around to it. With the old transmission, the speedo seemed to be right on. With the new one, it reads a bit high (about 64MPH when I'm doing 60). Eventually, I'll trade VSS's with the old transmission and see what happens. On the other hand, the guy that sold me the transmission told me that it has a slightly different rear end from my old one. I don't know why an Oldsmobile with a 3800 would need a different rear end from a Buick with a 3800. The new one is from a 1995 Oldsmobile with a 3800.
-
While talking with different persons about Scott's car, Devilles and Sevilles with the identical engine have different final drives. Could be tire diameter differences between cars.
-
You may recall that I thought I needed a fuel pressure regulator from my problem thread. Well, I had ordered one just in case, and yesterday I put it on. It seems to have fixed a couple of problems.
Problem 1: If I stopped for a while when the engine was hot (i.e., to get gas), and then started the car again, the idle would "hunt" (go up and down).
Problem 2: If I tried to accelerate while going up hill, the transmission would downshift, and never go back into 4th gear after the climb, unless I put the car in neutral, shut the engine off, re-started it, and put the car back in gear. It was doing this occasionally on the drive home.
I read up online about problem 2, and the consensus was that the PCM will do this if it detects a lean mixture, and that a new fuel filter will usually fix it. My fuel filter is fairly new, but I was going to try changing it anyway. But after changing the FPR, the problem seems to have gone away, along with the hunting idle. I went on a bit of a test drive yesterday, and a longer one today. For today's test, I went up I-85 to exit 129, gassed up at Charlie's Race Track, and drove back home, being sure to accelerate up hills each way. Neither problem happened.
Now I think I can quit working on "White Lightning" for a while, and change the ball joints in my Ford Escape.
-
Glad you got those issues sorted.
-
Can you share the brand / size / widths / offsets of your wheels?
88s are difficult to do for most people, including me. But you seem to have a knack for getting it right.
Thanks.
-
Wheels are DDR Fusion 17x7.5, offset 38. Tires are 215-50R17 on all 4 wheels. (I like to be able to rotate.)
-
Wheels are DDR Fusion 17x7.5, offset 38. Tires are 215-50R17 on all 4 wheels. (I like to be able to rotate.)
Excellent! Thank you.
-
If you have been following my other threads, you know I have a low mount alternator kit installed, and have fixed a problem with it. And I seem to have fixed a problem with the transmission modulator also.
But now I'm getting a SES light every time I drive a little while, and the code indicates a bad knock sensor. This engine has two of them, one for each bank. And I really wish I had thought to replace them when I had the engine out of the car.
I dove under the car and found both of them, and they are both rusty and look like they have been in there for ever. If the rear one is the bad one, be a real bear to replace it. It's in the block, between the oil pan and that long part of the automatic transmission that goes to the passenger side wheel. But I think I can get to it with a wobble extension and the appropriate size socket.
Here's a video on how to test these things, and the ones shown in the video look like the exact ones on my car. I have a couple on order.
-
I pulled out the one on the front side of the engine, and it doesn't generate any voltage at all, so I think it's bad. I'm going to try to test the resistance of the other one by measuring at the PCM connector where my chart from Sinister Performance says it goes to.
-
Good luck with yours.
I had a knock sensor code on my truck (LM7 "LS" engine.)
There are two knock sensors that fit in two "wells" in the valley pan, on top of the engine.
Had to remove the intake manifold to replace the bad one. (Possibly it was okay, but the well was full of water. Already had the sensor. Easier to replace it, than do it over.)
Thanks for the video. I'm going to need it before too long.
-
They're screwed into the bottom of the block on each side of the oil pan on a 3800, so they don't get flooded, but they would be subject to any splashing.
-
My new knock sensors are in, and I went on a test drive that before would have been long enough to get a SES light. Not this time.
My old knock sensors. May they rust in peace.

-
It looks like that engine may have came from a salt zone. Maybe he got it in Florida.
-
Today I went to Ace and got some aluminum tubing to make a new vacuum line for the transmission modulator. The plastic line melted (for the 2nd time).
Aluminum tubing is very difficult to bend, even if you have a tubing bender. It tends to kink. But if you insert some flexible insulated wire of the proper diameter in the tubing, you can bend it without kinking.
-
Just hope that the bend doesn't crimp down on the wire so you can't get it out.
-
Just hope that the bend doesn't crimp down on the wire so you can't get it out.
I got it out, and it works. I will go on a longer test drive tomorrow to see how it holds up.
-
Update on my knock sensor problems. I was still getting an occasional knock sensor error, so it was time to hit the book. A while back, I had bought a 1995 Buick Park Avenue service manual (which also covers other GM 3800-powered cars of that year). The manual said that if a scanner didn't show knock retard when the error occurred, it had to be something else, and suggested that if "secondary ignition cables" (translation: spark plug wires) were near the knock sensor wire, that could cause the false error.
Now, I didn't get the errors until after installing the low mount alternator, and that caused the spark plug wires to take a slightly different path to the rear plugs. So I tried a simple re-routing of the wires, as shown in the picture below.

All I did was move the wires to the other side of the oil filler cap as shown. Then I went on the same test drive that had produced a knock sensor code. No code this time. Could it be that simple? The bundle that the spark plug wires pass over contains, among other things, the knock sensor wire.
On this engine, unlike on newer engines, there is only one wire to both sensors, and only one code set. Newer cars can tell you which sensor set the error.

One other interesting thing. The manual shows both the series 1 and series 2 3800's as possible engines for the 95 cars. That means that the change-over was done mid-year in 1995. And that explains why it is sometimes hard to get the right part for this engine. For example, when I tried to get a new throttle position sensor, the first one I got at the parts store was wrong. I had asked for the 1995 part. I then asked for the 1996 part, and it was correct.
-
So can we assume you have a Series II engine? Is there any difference internally or just the externals?
You're so good at troubleshooting, I need to let you foster my two for a while.
Edit: Or all 3.
-
So can we assume you have a Series II engine?
It's definitely a series II. The intake manifold is series II, and all parts that changed between series I and II are series II.
I went on a longer test drive, and then to the store. No knock sensor error. That's one error that always lights the SES light when it happens. Some errors don't, and the manual lists which do and which don't.
-
Even with the mid-year changeover, they still used the OBD 1.5 ECM? Is it possible it could be outfitted with the more common OBD II ECM?
-
I'm pretty sure OBD II wasn't introduced until '96, regardless of engine. And my OBD ii scanner doesn't work on it.
-
...
So I tried a simple re-routing of the wires, as shown in the picture below.

All I did was move the wires to the other side of the oil filler cap as shown.
In their previous location, they would seem to have run parallel to that wire harness for some distance.
In their new location, they cross at nearly a right angle. A right angle crossing is just about always preferred, in the case where one signal can affect another.
-
Is it possible it could be outfitted with the more common OBD II ECM?
The one that's in there works just fine, and, as they say, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it".
-
It turned out that the knock sensor problem wasn't spark wire interference, and moving the spark plug wires to make it better was just coincidence. It was a momentary short, and it decided to be a more permanent short today. I fired up the car, and the SES light came on immediately, and the scanner said it was a knock sensor error. So I measured the resistance at the pin going to the PCM, and it was much lower than when I measured it previously.
There was a frayed section of the wire going to the back knock sensor, and it was touching some grounded metal. So I had to make a new one and had to fish it through to where it connects to the front sensor wire. All better now (i hope).
-
Sounds like you got it. Good save!
-
Good deal.
Does anyone make new harnesses? For stock motors that is.
-
I thought I heard an exhaust leak, so I investigated. Turns out that I have a cracked manifold. In the picture below, I have peeled back some of the heat shielding where the crack is. Since than, I have removed it all.

After removing the heat shielding, I found that the crack doesn't go all the way around. I'll probably have to weld it, but for now, I decided to try something I found at AutoZone. It's called VersaChem Exhaust Seal Joint and Crack Sealer. It's supposed to dry in 4 hours, but I won't try running the car until tomorrow. We shall see.
-
...I decided to try something I found at AutoZone. It's called VersaChem Exhaust Seal Joint and Crack Sealer. It's supposed to dry in 4 hours, but I won't try running the car until tomorrow. We shall see.
Good luck with the fix. Please let us know. I tried something similar - a JB Weld product, I think. It lasted for about an hour. But that was a long time ago. I hope the technology/chemistry has progressed some, in 15 years.
-
I cant say for certain but you might have made it impossible to get a good weld. In past experience any kind of silicone based sealer cant be completely removed and contaminates the weld. Im sure the wizardry behind it has advanced but I would still be leery
-
Provided it can be repaired, would brazing work? It might be accomplished without removing the manifold. If it has to be removed, it should be bolted down to another head to keep it from warping during repair.
-
On this manifold, the three tubes that go to the exhaust ports are all tied together by a metal bar, and the bar is attached to the head. Studs are used in most places, but there are also two bolts used. You can see one of the bolts in this picture. I have no idea why it's that way.
Because of the bar, I don't think the manifold would have to be mounted to be welded. And I don't think brazing with it on the car is a good idea. The work actually gets hotter with brazing than with welding, because the work must be heated enough to melt the brazing rod. With welding, just the immediate area of the weld is heated by the electric arc.
Edit: The blackened spark plug boot is right above where the crack was. It's just surface blackening.

-
Good luck with the fix. Please let us know. I tried something similar - a JB Weld product, I think. It lasted for about an hour. But that was a long time ago. I hope the technology/chemistry has progressed some, in 15 years.
I went to the store in the car, and the fix held that long at least.
The VersaChem stuff is a water-based paste I think. It has no smell. I think it is some kind of ceramic, and the heat of the exhaust works like a kiln to harden the ceramic. The problem with that is that if there is vibration of the crack, that could work a ridged ceramic loose. I'll keep test driving it and see what happens.
-
Now that I've had a good look at the rear exhaust manifold on my car, it looks at least partly home-made. It looks too crude to be a factory job. And I looked at 95, 96, and 97 manifolds sold on Rock Auto, and it doesn't look like any of those. So one way or another, I will have to fix it myself.
Here's one I found on Rock Auto. Mine definitely doesn't have the big opening in the middle, but just the cross-over pipe connector. Otherwise, it looks the same, including the EGR tap-off on the left port connection.

-
Well, the muffler sealer didn't work, and fell out of the crack. So I decided to try welding it on the car.
It just so happened that a while back, I bought a new solid state "stick welder" (one that uses welding rods, not wire). I hadn't tried it yet, because it runs on 240V, so first I had to add a 240V outlet in my garage.

Because the welder is solid state, it is very small and light weight, compared to my old Harbor Freight wire welder. In this picture, it is tuned on with the current set to 41 amps.

I first did a little test weld on a piece of angle iron, and that worked pretty good

So now it was time to try it on the manifold. Unfortunately, I had the current set too high, and burned a couple of little holes in the manifold. So I turned it down (70 to 41), and was able to fill the holes and the main crack. It's awfully ugly, but a lot better than that VersaChem stuff.

-
I put another VersaChem product, called "Muffler Weld" over the welded area and any crack outside the welded area. This product is dark gray, not white, so it looks better, and it seems to stick to the metal better.
I let it harden overnight, and drove to the store today. The exhaust noise was quieter than it's ever been, indicating a good seal. While I was welding, the heat seemed to make the crack outside the welding area close, and the weld has held it closed. The engine is quiet enough now that I can hear things I hadn't noticed before, such as a slight valve train noise. So far, I'm happy with the result.
-
I made a stethoscope out of a piece of plastic tubing and listened around the weld for exhaust leaks. I found some, wire-brushed off the VersaChem stiff, and did more welding, and it looks like this:

Now the only leak I can hear is around on the engine side of the manifold, where I can't reach with a welding rod. I may yet have to take the thing off. But for now, I packed in some of that VersaChem stuff with my finger on that side. After it dries, I'll check for leaks again.
-
I guess that because there's a shortage of cars to buy these days, more people are fixing up their existing cars. The Maaco where I had my white car painted is booked solid until October 25, until I can take my car in to have the RFTH boo-boo fixed.

-
Today I removed the exhaust manifold with the cracks in it to fix them correctly. I as too cold after I got it out to finish the job, so I'll do that tomorrow.
-
It seem like that every time i take something apart on this car to work on it, I discover another "short cut" the original builder of the engine swap did. The exhaust manifold I took off was mounted with no gasket -- just metal to metal against the head. Now I'll have to check the other side to see if it was put on that way, too.
-
It seem like that every time i take something apart on this car to work on it, I discover another "short cut" the original builder of the engine swap did. The exhaust manifold I took off was mounted with no gasket -- just metal to metal against the head. Now I'll have to check the other side to see if it was put on that way, too.
Are you certain that the manifolds have ever even been off the engine?
I've taken stock (cast iron) manifolds off of several engines over the years. They were always "metal to metal". Not even a steel shim gasket.
Of course, the reason they were coming off was so that I could install headers, so I always went back with gaskets.
-
I'm pretty sure the manifold had been off the car. It appears to have been modified (somewhat crudely, which may be why it cracked). The entire exhaust takes the same path as a stock V6, and I don't think it was that way in the donor car. And carbon traces on the manifold indicated that it leaked slightly where it was attached to the head.
Edit: In any case, it has a gasket on it now.
-
Ah. Okay.
Didn't realize that it followed the stock path.
-
I thought stock 3800 exhausts crossed over to what is our trunk side. Their firewall side.
-
I thought stock 3800 exhausts crossed over to what is our trunk side. Their firewall side.
My trunk side manifold looks like this, except that it doesn't have the big pipe outlet on it.
