Home
About Us
Calendar
Fiero Documents
Merchandise
Tips
Links
Members
Message Board
Other Fiero Clubs
VIN Decoder
Speed Calculator
GFC Facebook Page
 

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - dgsmooth

Pages: [1] 2
1
well finnaly got my parts order in. today put my short block chevy cam bearings in, so i made a thread on how to do that. tomorrow to hone cylinders, put new crank timing sprocket on and hopefully put crank and pistons in. all parts look good/correct so far

2
ok cheers again all. so i'm replacing the cam bearings in my 3.4 with short block chevy cam bearigs. i of course did a little research on the forums and found Hudini's thread, which is great, but like other info i found it sort of assumes you know more (than i knew anyway) already. there were a couple points to the process i didnt quite understand. and like anything its always better to understand what youre doing rather than to just follow the steps blindy.

so putting SBC bearings in would hopefully extend the life of them as they are wider and offer more surface area that the stock bearings. i can't remember the numbers exactly, i think the stock ones are 5/8" wide and SBC 3/4". and for literaly a couple more dollars why wouldn't you if you have them out anyway.



first thing that i didnt understand was the order of removing and installing the bearing and why they had to go from one end or the other. and again once you understand why you can put them in any way you like. this also ties into the sizes, and why if you use the 5 piece SBC bearing kit you won't use he #1 bearing. the only bearings that can simply be pushed in, on the V6, V8 or any V engine i suppose (that has cam in block) are the first and last. all the other bearing have to go through other bearing positions to get to their final installation position. this is why the different bearing o.d.sizes - in a V6, (4 bearings), the #2 and #3 have to go through #1 nd #4 positions to get to their spots. this is why the #1/4 are bigger than #2/3. #2/3 are 2.000" o.d., but #1/4 are 2.010". that extra 0.010" is what allows the #2/3 bearings to go through the #1/4 position without losig there initial 'crush/interferance' fit that holds them in place. this also is why the V8 set, with 5 bearings, has the #1 bearing that is 0.020" bigger, because the #3 in that case has to go through the #2 position, (0.010" biigger), as well as the #1 position (0.020"). this makes #2 0.010" bigger than #3 and #1 0.010" bigger than #2. they could have deisgned it so that the #3 goes through the back of engine, in which case #5 would be the one 0.020" bigger.

if it was a V10 (6 bearings) #1 and #6 would both be 0.020" bigger. and if a V12 (7 bearings), either #1 or #7 would have to be 0.030" bigger as 3 bearings would hae to pass through it, and of course all need to have there 0.010" cush fit when going into their final spot. i felt so smart once i figured out this logic.

so once that is clear, you can see you can put bearings in anyway you like. i used a tool that could pull bearings and not just push, so i simply pulled 1 and 2 out he front and 3 and 4 out the back. then put #2 in through #1, and then #3 in thouh #4. then push 1 and 4 in you're done. the kit that will work is sealed power 1235m, so any cross to that will work. only issue is the #2 bearing in the SBC kit (which will be the #1 bearing in 2.8/3.1/3.4), doesn't have the second oil feed hole. (the second hole would be in the SBC kit #1 bearing, which is 0.020" bigger and not used in V6). so i took a picture of that, simply line them up and drill a second hole, you just have to delicatly remove any burr or lip created by drilling:



next is the small groove that goes from the one oil hole forward, to allow a small tricle of oil out the bearing and down to the timing chain/spockets. this part is debatable. Hudini did this job and didn"t even make an oil groove and has had no issues. also, i attempted the measure the depth of the groove with vernier calipers (on the old bearing), only to find that around the very outer edge of the bearing the groove depth is baically zero. looks like whatver pushed the beearing in flared the outer edge slightly and effectively no oil was getting through. now these bearings may have been out before, so a stock engine might have an actual functional groove, but this 3.4 didn't and suffered no consequences in 70000 km. so that could up to anybodies discretion wether its worth doing or not. i did it anyways just in case. first i tried using the edge of a small, sharp, 3-sided file, but was too slow. i VERY delicatly used my cut-off wheel tool. if you brave enough to do so, be sure you have a very steady hand and be very delicate. you can't heat the bearing and don't want to go too deep. since no groove would probably be okay, and stock is supposedly 0.025" deep i made it about 0.010" to 0.015" deep and then put it in. here's the final bearing before install:





the second pic is actually after the file attempt and before using the zip-wheel, but you get the idea. so that's it - hopefully that saves somebody a bunch of time wondering why its done a certain way.

3
Tech Tips, Tech Questions / Re: throttle body vs multiport injection
« on: October 20, 2013, 06:34:03 pm »
I see.....but thats for 4 cylinders only, all v6's had multiport? so the current owners story of the car originally having throttle body injection doesnt make sense does it?

unless....it is a 4 cylinder and he just doesnt know what he's talking about. could you get a 4 cylinder in a gt? I can see by photos its a gt, but maybe body panels were just swapped

I could get this caf for a grand or little less so hoping I can figure this out, something not making sense to me so so far

4
Tech Tips, Tech Questions / throttle body vs multiport injection
« on: October 20, 2013, 01:23:10 pm »
cheers again - wondering if fieros ever came with throttle body injection? I thought all fuel injected ones were multiport? reason is im looking at another 86gt, current owner says the previous owner swapped from the throttle bodg injection it had to multiport, but never got as far as the computer and wiring changes.....

- so im wondering if throttle body was/could have been the stock setup?

- if so, what all would be entailed in that swap?

5
General Fiero Discussion / Re: is an 88 fiero better than previous years?
« on: October 18, 2013, 11:00:10 pm »
mmmmm, based on that 1988 does sound 'better', parts availability and price aside, sounds like better performance for sure, is there a reliability trade-off or not really/necesarily?

reason i'm asking all this as i want to get a low mileage car in original shape and put a small block v8 of some type in it, and likely keep it forever....i know a nice 88gt is not easy/cheap to find, but am i better off (if i'm keeping it for the long haul) to just bite the bullet and pay more/be patient and get an 88? i mean im not rich, but the difference between and $2500 86/87 and a $5000 88 seems minor if i plan on keeping it for a long time. i have a nice 86gt i just got, and its nice - loaded, leather, all original and excellent shape, but still yearn for an 88.....looking for a little experience input from a drivers/mechanics point of view who's ownder and 88 as well as other years. thanks again topnotch

edit - sorry first time i read your reply i didn't see the very first sentance - you have both, the one i have now and the one i want.....i think i'm on the market for a original 88gt. and have a 86gt with 3.4 for sale shortly

6
General Fiero Discussion / is an 88 fiero better than previous years?
« on: October 18, 2013, 09:51:21 pm »
cheers mates - wondering about the difference from and 88 to all other years....i've been told by guys (not fiero owners/fans) that previous to 1988 fiero's shared a lot of parts, mostly steering and suspension, with pontiac acadians and chevettes type stuff. and then in 1988 it was truly its own design (and better?). i currently have an 86 gt, the owner i got it from described the 88 as much more 'car like', smoother steering and ride. (he's owned an 88 as well as couple other years). and the 86 he described as much more of a 'drivers' car, he likened it like a go-cart, really goes where you want it type thing. i guess this is all hear-say and opinion, what i'm really looking for are the facts;

- what years are 'the same'. my guess is 86/87 gt's the same, and 88 different?

- what is different/better about 88 from 86/87?

- what parts are and arent't interchangable from the 86/87 to the 88?

and after the physical parts differences, what are the real world ramifications of all that - are the 88's better handling, more/less reliable?

thanks again to all for the help.

edit - i'm really appreciating all the advice and help i'm getting from this forum. i've joined all the fiero forums i could google and this one is realy great (don't get me wrong, i'm sure there's other good ones as well). i'm a big user of forums, i (was) heavy into r/c nitro racing, own multiple quads, dirtbikes, boat, diesel pusher motorhome, as well as multiple vehicles, and being mechanic do all work on everything i/we own myself. first place i always turn when starting something new is the forums - and i can say this forum is one of the best. i'm looking forward to being able to put something back and maybe help somebody else out. i m putting the chevy small block cam bearings in the 3.4 i have in this fiero, and since not too many threads, or at least with good pictures etc of that procedure, that'll be my first contribution. ciao for now

7
cheers again mates - wondering what people have been doing to repair rotten battery trays? i dont have my car (86 gt) in my shop at moment but i don't think the tray un-bolts and comes out. so is the common repair to carefully cut it out, fab something and tack it into place? i was wondering about cutting one out of another car but seems this a common problem, doubting i could ever find a good one. hoping maybe some folks have pictures of what they have built maybe....i was thinking of fabricatinga frame then using stretched metal type thing to make the tray, that way no water (or snow for me here) will get trapped and sit under battery.... any thoughts from others greatly appreciated

8
exactly right, all plugs did come out nicely and I thoroughly blasted it all out....engine supposedly had about 65000 on it, and owner I got it from who owned it at that time was a very meticulous type....although he also didnt know it was a 3.4. I may end up dying of old age and never knowing the answer to this one

9
well thats all great news to me.....i knew those gaskets in the other mentioned kits were not the proper gasket for my water pump, but that scared me in the sense that maybe my water pump may be wrong one or something to that effect....the wrong gasket in those kits sounded like a long shot but that is what i was hoping the case was, am sure relieved to hear that from you raydar.

my block definetly does have the big F stamped on it as well.....i remember because as i was stripping this down and found the cam missing lobes and rod and main bearings full of the debris i saw the F and thought, "i know what that stands for - F'd cause thats what this this thing is".

well sounds like i'm on the right track with everything then....just waiting for some parts to show up so i can get started! thanks again guys

10
yes that very last picture by fierofool is the water pump i have, same one as topnotch showed in his photo. i attached another pic, shows the water pump i have, and the next two gaskets below are the tow from the two kit examples fierofool showed (one for each rotation). but as you can see niether will work on that pump. the very bottom gasket is the one i originally posted and the one i have on the way....

here is the pic showing the pump and all three gaskets:



somthing is askew.....

11
no niether of those gaskets you sent fierofool would work for me....the rotation is correct on the one like you pointed out but the other smaller chamber beside the main impeller chamber is the wrong shape and also in the wrong position. if you look at the second gasket kit photo i attached, the one where it shows both rotation gaskets in one kit, the gasket on the right is the one i need. the smaller chamber is square, rotation from that view is right hand and the secondary rectangular chamber is belowe/beside the main not above the inlet/outlet tube section. i'll microsoft paint an example and attach.....this making we scared wrong waterpump/ratation been on this engine, maybe cause/contribution of failure?

the oil pan photo is correct, so the first kit photo i attached shows the wrong pan as i thought. i mean i knew it was wrong for my pan, but unsure if my pan was the proper/stock pan. that part is good news. and yes those are the injectors i have, like you said all black though. thanks again guys, i'll get a better photo to show this water pump discepancy

12
okay everybody forgive me, im sure its me but i'm just not getting this gasket issue; when i look up gasket kit for 2.8, the water pump gasket isn't right, the opening to the right of the main impeller opening is sort off oval shaped, 1" by 2" type size, but on my engine its perfectly rectangular.....also the 2.8 oil pan isn't right. it shows it much more 'pointed' on the front end, with four bolt holes going up into the timing cover. mine has no bolts there, the front of the gasket is the same as the back end more or less. does a normal 2.8 pan look like this one:



or like mine, which is like this one:



you can also see in the second licture the two different water pump gaskets....mine is the one on the right, the one you get with a 2.8 kit is the one on the left.

i'm realizing as i write this that as i don't know what this engine is made of etc etc i'm just going to have to order something and see how it goes when i get it.

on a good note the flywheel has already had the balanceing weight removed.

and i found my injectors are #'s 5235210

13
okay this is what i've got coming:

cam and lifter set:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/cca-cl16-233-4/overview/

main bearings:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/cle-ms2037p/overview/

rod bearings:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/slp-6-4020a/overview/

timing set:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/slp-kt3-368s/overview/

bottom end gasket set:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/fel-cs9471/overview/

top end gasket set:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/fel-hs9105pt/overview/

12 of these push tubes:

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/slp-rp-3207/overview/

2 sets of these rings....enough for 8 cylinders cause thats all they had in stock. they 1.5 x 1.5 x 4.0 and 92mm bore so what difference from 4 cyl to 6 cyl? 2 sets for 4 cyl cheaper than sme set for 6 cyl anyway.... not sure why that is, unless i'm missing smething there.....

http://www.summitracing.com/int/parts/slp-e-510k/overview/

so hopefully this stuff will work based on the engine/intake combination i have. i can see in the head/upper set an o-ring, hopefully thats the one for the themostat housing, although i havent actaully seperated it there anyway. as well the bottom end set shows a couple small o-rings, hopefully one of those is for the under the one main bearing as fierofool infofmed me - i actaully didn't notice an o-ring there when dis-assembling, but will check that tomorrow along with flywheel weights and injector part #'s. i'm 95% sure injectors are stock 2.8, but very curious to see (or hopefully not see) flywheel weights. can't believe i forgot that - tempted to drive down to shop now to look but too much drink for that - will have to dream about it till tomorrow.

thanks again people. i've joined all the fiero forums i could find, other great ones as well but definelty warm (est) feeling from this group of fiero-addicts

14
okay i think i have my email/pm issue fixed, i definelty dont want to miss out on any advice coming my way....

i've checked the block and casting is # 10118608, my best google-ing shows its a 3.4

heads casting is 14054884, and like the fool stated that is the stock head for 2.8 and 3.4 (and 3.1?)

i checked the timing cover, and i couldnt quite see what was meant by it slanting inward as it meets the block.... the pan flange is 90 degree/flat all the way around, timing cover look the same idea, no slant, just straight down, 90 degree corner and then straight towards block. if i'm interpreting that right, its a 2.8 cover?

also checked ecm, is part number 1227170, so that is stock ecm, not the upgraded one to go with bigger injectors.

i was out of town today (looking at two other fiero's  ::), and on way home stopped at shop i work at to get all that info off of parts but forgot to check flywheel for weights and injector #'s, but i'll do that tomorrow)

i am going to get more/better info on the parts i have coming, just so a foolish expert can take a look at tell me how i messed it up and why i'm going to be choked when i don't have the proper gaskets to re-assemble later..... ;D

thanks again to fierofool and the other guys in the know who have helped me so far - would already be lost without that kind of guideance

15
wow thanks for the info, you are clearly familiar with a situation like mine.....I think I must have a 2.8 and 3.4 combination. I still have a distributor, and I dont have low oil sensor. but when I tore engine apart and measured I found all 3.4 numbers....92 mm pistons, and block casting number matches for a 3.4. also starter bolts to block not clutch housing. also found cam is a comp 16-233-4. so somebody has done some fiddleing with this thing, but I really dont know the exent to such.

I think next I'm going to see if I can find some head casting numbers, is there a way to tell 15 and 17 injectors apart? I also found a broken sensor on the right side (rearward side I guess), couple inches up from pan, goes into cooling system. but cant find it on any 2.8 diagrams...I also am pretty sure I dont have the temp sensor on the top corner of the rearward head.....would that indicate I have somehing other than the stock 2.8 harness? the broken sensor had nothing plugged into it, and I'll look at my harness again but didnt see any loose end that would go to it.

anywho thanks for all the info and help. I've always wanted a fiero, just didnt really want such a mystery to start with. I gues when yoh buy a car with an engine knock yoh know youre in for some fun. I have got the bug though, already got my eye on a couple more.....thanks again and cheers for now

Pages: [1] 2